Afghanistan vs Japan

Overall Mutual Score: 50.6%

Overall Fit Rank50.6%
Trade Pull15.2%
Mutual Win Potential47.6%
Risk Drag14.6%

Afghanistan profile

Market Size79.5%
Resource Strength14.5%
Tech Readiness51.5%
Human Capital44.2%
Infrastructure76.4%
Energy Position20.0%
Climate Pressure1.7%
Governance22.0%

Japan profile

Market Size90.9%
Resource Strength19.9%
Tech Readiness93.5%
Human Capital62.0%
Infrastructure73.2%
Energy Position8.8%
Climate Pressure47.1%
Governance79.3%

What These Countries Should Do Together

Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

67.7%

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Afghanistan

64.4%

Japan

71.0%

Shared gain

47.6%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

40.5%

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

Afghanistan

36.2%

Japan

44.8%

Shared gain

20.0%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

32.8%

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Afghanistan

34.1%

Japan

31.5%

Shared gain

12.7%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

27.0%

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Afghanistan

26.1%

Japan

27.9%

Shared gain

6.9%

Critical Resource and Energy Exchange

8.0%

Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.

Afghanistan

13.4%

Japan

2.7%

Shared gain

0.0%