Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration
66.1%
Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.
Afghanistan
61.9%
Sweden
70.3%
Shared gain
45.9%
Afghanistan vs Sweden
Overall Mutual Score: 49.5%
Overall Fit Rank49.5%
Trade Pull19.7%
Mutual Win Potential45.9%
Risk Drag15.5%
Afghanistan profile
Market Size79.5%
Resource Strength14.5%
Tech Readiness51.5%
Human Capital44.2%
Infrastructure76.4%
Energy Position20.0%
Climate Pressure1.7%
Governance22.0%
Sweden profile
Market Size82.0%
Resource Strength14.5%
Tech Readiness97.8%
Human Capital64.5%
Infrastructure100.0%
Energy Position57.9%
Climate Pressure21.4%
Governance86.3%
What These Countries Should Do Together
Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.
Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership
41.0%
Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.
Afghanistan
37.5%
Sweden
44.4%
Shared gain
20.7%
Technology Transfer and Joint R&D
34.7%
Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.
Afghanistan
36.7%
Sweden
32.7%
Shared gain
14.5%
Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact
13.4%
Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.
Afghanistan
9.5%
Sweden
17.3%
Shared gain
0.0%
Critical Resource and Energy Exchange
5.9%
Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.
Afghanistan
9.0%
Sweden
2.7%
Shared gain
0.0%