Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration
63.4%
Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.
Iraq
54.8%
Sweden
72.0%
Shared gain
42.5%
Iraq vs Sweden
Overall Mutual Score: 49.1%
Overall Fit Rank49.1%
Trade Pull29.3%
Mutual Win Potential42.5%
Risk Drag19.0%
Iraq profile
Market Size84.2%
Resource Strength16.7%
Tech Readiness90.9%
Human Capital83.6%
Infrastructure85.4%
Energy Position1.1%
Climate Pressure31.1%
Governance19.9%
Sweden profile
Market Size82.0%
Resource Strength14.5%
Tech Readiness97.8%
Human Capital64.5%
Infrastructure100.0%
Energy Position57.9%
Climate Pressure21.4%
Governance86.3%
What These Countries Should Do Together
Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.
Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership
48.1%
Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.
Iraq
40.5%
Sweden
55.8%
Shared gain
27.1%
Technology Transfer and Joint R&D
15.0%
Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.
Iraq
17.0%
Sweden
13.0%
Shared gain
0.0%
Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact
6.1%
Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.
Iraq
3.4%
Sweden
8.9%
Shared gain
0.0%
Critical Resource and Energy Exchange
6.1%
Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.
Iraq
10.1%
Sweden
2.0%
Shared gain
0.0%