Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration
59.8%
Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.
Iceland
50.4%
Sweden
69.2%
Shared gain
38.7%
Iceland vs Sweden
Overall Mutual Score: 51.5%
Overall Fit Rank51.5%
Trade Pull43.4%
Mutual Win Potential38.7%
Risk Drag12.3%
Iceland profile
Market Size69.5%
Resource Strength3.2%
Tech Readiness99.9%
Human Capital65.7%
Infrastructure93.0%
Energy Position82.4%
Climate Pressure51.1%
Governance82.7%
Sweden profile
Market Size82.0%
Resource Strength14.5%
Tech Readiness97.8%
Human Capital64.5%
Infrastructure100.0%
Energy Position57.9%
Climate Pressure21.4%
Governance86.3%
What These Countries Should Do Together
Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.
Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership
43.4%
Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.
Iceland
36.0%
Sweden
50.7%
Shared gain
22.2%
Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact
24.1%
Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.
Iceland
18.2%
Sweden
30.0%
Shared gain
0.0%
Critical Resource and Energy Exchange
15.8%
Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.
Iceland
16.2%
Sweden
15.4%
Shared gain
0.0%
Technology Transfer and Joint R&D
13.7%
Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.
Iceland
13.9%
Sweden
13.5%
Shared gain
0.0%