Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration
59.6%
Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.
Israel
58.9%
Sudan
60.4%
Shared gain
39.6%
Israel vs Sudan
Overall Mutual Score: 48.4%
Overall Fit Rank48.4%
Trade Pull50.8%
Mutual Win Potential39.6%
Risk Drag31.5%
Israel profile
Market Size81.7%
Resource Strength6.6%
Tech Readiness94.1%
Human Capital92.6%
Infrastructure77.2%
Energy Position6.2%
Climate Pressure34.7%
Governance66.1%
Sudan profile
Market Size81.7%
Resource Strength17.0%
Tech Readiness46.2%
Human Capital52.7%
Infrastructure34.0%
Energy Position61.0%
Climate Pressure2.6%
Governance18.2%
What These Countries Should Do Together
Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.
Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership
47.7%
Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.
Israel
44.3%
Sudan
51.1%
Shared gain
27.5%
Technology Transfer and Joint R&D
34.9%
Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.
Israel
37.4%
Sudan
32.5%
Shared gain
14.7%
Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact
18.9%
Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.
Israel
16.6%
Sudan
21.3%
Shared gain
0.0%
Critical Resource and Energy Exchange
9.1%
Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.
Israel
12.7%
Sudan
5.5%
Shared gain
0.0%