Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration
61.6%
Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.
Jordan
63.7%
South Sudan
59.5%
Shared gain
41.5%
Jordan vs South Sudan
Overall Mutual Score: 47.5%
Overall Fit Rank47.5%
Trade Pull26.8%
Mutual Win Potential41.5%
Risk Drag32.2%
Jordan profile
Market Size78.3%
Resource Strength3.1%
Tech Readiness96.3%
Human Capital93.0%
Infrastructure99.8%
Energy Position11.5%
Climate Pressure12.5%
Governance53.5%
South Sudan profile
Market Size76.0%
Resource Strength11.8%
Tech Readiness7.3%
Human Capital34.6%
Infrastructure35.5%
Energy Position32.4%
Climate Pressure0.0%
Governance8.9%
What These Countries Should Do Together
Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.
Technology Transfer and Joint R&D
54.6%
Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.
Jordan
59.7%
South Sudan
49.6%
Shared gain
34.2%
Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership
45.9%
Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.
Jordan
47.1%
South Sudan
44.7%
Shared gain
25.8%
Critical Resource and Energy Exchange
6.7%
Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.
Jordan
10.8%
South Sudan
2.5%
Shared gain
0.0%
Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact
5.8%
Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.
Jordan
4.4%
South Sudan
7.1%
Shared gain
0.0%