Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration
61.6%
Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.
Jordan
51.7%
Sweden
71.4%
Shared gain
40.4%
Jordan vs Sweden
Overall Mutual Score: 50.3%
Overall Fit Rank50.3%
Trade Pull28.8%
Mutual Win Potential40.4%
Risk Drag18.6%
Jordan profile
Market Size78.3%
Resource Strength3.1%
Tech Readiness96.3%
Human Capital93.0%
Infrastructure99.8%
Energy Position11.5%
Climate Pressure12.5%
Governance53.5%
Sweden profile
Market Size82.0%
Resource Strength14.5%
Tech Readiness97.8%
Human Capital64.5%
Infrastructure100.0%
Energy Position57.9%
Climate Pressure21.4%
Governance86.3%
What These Countries Should Do Together
Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.
Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership
50.2%
Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.
Jordan
42.3%
Sweden
58.1%
Shared gain
29.2%
Technology Transfer and Joint R&D
12.3%
Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.
Jordan
15.0%
Sweden
9.6%
Shared gain
0.0%
Critical Resource and Energy Exchange
12.3%
Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.
Jordan
15.7%
Sweden
8.9%
Shared gain
0.0%
Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact
7.2%
Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.
Jordan
4.8%
Sweden
9.5%
Shared gain
0.0%