Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration
67.9%
Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.
Japan
59.6%
Sweden
76.1%
Shared gain
47.1%
Japan vs Sweden
Overall Mutual Score: 50.3%
Overall Fit Rank50.3%
Trade Pull13.2%
Mutual Win Potential47.1%
Risk Drag6.9%
Japan profile
Market Size90.9%
Resource Strength19.9%
Tech Readiness93.5%
Human Capital62.0%
Infrastructure73.2%
Energy Position8.8%
Climate Pressure47.1%
Governance79.3%
Sweden profile
Market Size82.0%
Resource Strength14.5%
Tech Readiness97.8%
Human Capital64.5%
Infrastructure100.0%
Energy Position57.9%
Climate Pressure21.4%
Governance86.3%
What These Countries Should Do Together
Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.
Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership
45.1%
Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.
Japan
36.9%
Sweden
53.3%
Shared gain
23.7%
Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact
18.2%
Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.
Japan
15.4%
Sweden
21.0%
Shared gain
0.0%
Technology Transfer and Joint R&D
17.8%
Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.
Japan
16.3%
Sweden
19.2%
Shared gain
0.0%
Critical Resource and Energy Exchange
11.1%
Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.
Japan
15.1%
Sweden
7.1%
Shared gain
0.0%