Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration
64.5%
Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.
Latvia
56.1%
Japan
72.8%
Shared gain
43.7%
Latvia vs Japan
Overall Mutual Score: 50.5%
Overall Fit Rank50.5%
Trade Pull12.0%
Mutual Win Potential43.7%
Risk Drag8.3%
Latvia profile
Market Size73.6%
Resource Strength14.7%
Tech Readiness96.4%
Human Capital93.9%
Infrastructure100.0%
Energy Position44.0%
Climate Pressure21.9%
Governance67.4%
Japan profile
Market Size90.9%
Resource Strength19.9%
Tech Readiness93.5%
Human Capital62.0%
Infrastructure73.2%
Energy Position8.8%
Climate Pressure47.1%
Governance79.3%
What These Countries Should Do Together
Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.
Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership
52.9%
Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.
Latvia
45.0%
Japan
60.9%
Shared gain
32.0%
Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact
17.0%
Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.
Latvia
14.9%
Japan
19.1%
Shared gain
0.0%
Technology Transfer and Joint R&D
16.9%
Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.
Latvia
18.7%
Japan
15.2%
Shared gain
0.0%
Critical Resource and Energy Exchange
9.9%
Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.
Latvia
14.0%
Japan
5.7%
Shared gain
0.0%