Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration
62.3%
Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.
Latvia
52.5%
Sweden
72.2%
Shared gain
41.2%
Latvia vs Sweden
Overall Mutual Score: 57.2%
Overall Fit Rank57.2%
Trade Pull100.0%
Mutual Win Potential41.2%
Risk Drag9.2%
Latvia profile
Market Size73.6%
Resource Strength14.7%
Tech Readiness96.4%
Human Capital93.9%
Infrastructure100.0%
Energy Position44.0%
Climate Pressure21.9%
Governance67.4%
Sweden profile
Market Size82.0%
Resource Strength14.5%
Tech Readiness97.8%
Human Capital64.5%
Infrastructure100.0%
Energy Position57.9%
Climate Pressure21.4%
Governance86.3%
What These Countries Should Do Together
Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.
Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership
52.9%
Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.
Latvia
45.2%
Sweden
60.5%
Shared gain
32.0%
Technology Transfer and Joint R&D
15.4%
Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.
Latvia
17.9%
Sweden
12.9%
Shared gain
0.0%
Critical Resource and Energy Exchange
8.0%
Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.
Latvia
10.0%
Sweden
5.9%
Shared gain
0.0%
Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact
4.5%
Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.
Latvia
0.0%
Sweden
9.1%
Shared gain
0.0%