Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration
61.7%
Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.
Latvia
58.8%
Togo
64.6%
Shared gain
41.6%
Latvia vs Togo
Overall Mutual Score: 49.6%
Overall Fit Rank49.6%
Trade Pull13.2%
Mutual Win Potential41.6%
Risk Drag11.9%
Latvia profile
Market Size73.6%
Resource Strength14.7%
Tech Readiness96.4%
Human Capital93.9%
Infrastructure100.0%
Energy Position44.0%
Climate Pressure21.9%
Governance67.4%
Togo profile
Market Size75.2%
Resource Strength15.7%
Tech Readiness48.1%
Human Capital61.1%
Infrastructure54.6%
Energy Position75.1%
Climate Pressure1.7%
Governance38.5%
What These Countries Should Do Together
Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.
Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership
55.4%
Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.
Latvia
52.8%
Togo
58.1%
Shared gain
35.3%
Technology Transfer and Joint R&D
38.9%
Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.
Latvia
44.7%
Togo
33.1%
Shared gain
18.0%
Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact
16.4%
Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.
Latvia
10.5%
Togo
22.3%
Shared gain
0.0%
Critical Resource and Energy Exchange
8.3%
Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.
Latvia
9.4%
Togo
7.2%
Shared gain
0.0%