Pakistan vs Sweden

Overall Mutual Score: 48.8%

Overall Fit Rank48.8%
Trade Pull19.8%
Mutual Win Potential46.9%
Risk Drag17.2%

Pakistan profile

Market Size88.7%
Resource Strength16.3%
Tech Readiness61.5%
Human Capital55.3%
Infrastructure61.6%
Energy Position41.6%
Climate Pressure4.9%
Governance31.4%

Sweden profile

Market Size82.0%
Resource Strength14.5%
Tech Readiness97.8%
Human Capital64.5%
Infrastructure100.0%
Energy Position57.9%
Climate Pressure21.4%
Governance86.3%

What These Countries Should Do Together

Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

67.1%

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Pakistan

62.7%

Sweden

71.6%

Shared gain

46.9%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

43.3%

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

Pakistan

38.4%

Sweden

48.2%

Shared gain

22.8%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

30.2%

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Pakistan

31.6%

Sweden

28.9%

Shared gain

10.1%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

12.5%

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Pakistan

7.7%

Sweden

17.3%

Shared gain

0.0%

Critical Resource and Energy Exchange

7.9%

Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.

Pakistan

10.5%

Sweden

5.2%

Shared gain

0.0%