Sudan vs United Kingdom

Overall Mutual Score: 43.5%

Overall Fit Rank43.5%
Trade Pull20.4%
Mutual Win Potential43.0%
Risk Drag31.4%

Sudan profile

Market Size81.7%
Resource Strength17.0%
Tech Readiness46.2%
Human Capital52.7%
Infrastructure34.0%
Energy Position61.0%
Climate Pressure2.6%
Governance18.2%

United Kingdom profile

Market Size89.3%
Resource Strength17.3%
Tech Readiness98.1%
Human Capital64.0%
Infrastructure81.4%
Energy Position12.2%
Climate Pressure25.3%
Governance78.8%

What These Countries Should Do Together

Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

63.0%

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Sudan

62.4%

United Kingdom

63.5%

Shared gain

43.0%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

39.9%

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

Sudan

36.6%

United Kingdom

43.3%

Shared gain

19.7%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

35.2%

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Sudan

36.3%

United Kingdom

34.0%

Shared gain

15.1%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

12.6%

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Sudan

9.0%

United Kingdom

16.3%

Shared gain

0.0%

Critical Resource and Energy Exchange

3.4%

Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.

Sudan

6.7%

United Kingdom

0.0%

Shared gain

0.0%