Suriname vs Japan

Overall Mutual Score: 46.4%

Overall Fit Rank46.4%
Trade Pull5.5%
Mutual Win Potential40.2%
Risk Drag12.9%

Suriname profile

Market Size67.4%
Resource Strength17.8%
Tech Readiness89.0%
Human Capital86.0%
Infrastructure94.8%
Energy Position14.5%
Climate Pressure24.4%
Governance45.3%

Japan profile

Market Size90.9%
Resource Strength19.9%
Tech Readiness93.5%
Human Capital62.0%
Infrastructure73.2%
Energy Position8.8%
Climate Pressure47.1%
Governance79.3%

What These Countries Should Do Together

Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

61.0%

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Suriname

53.1%

Japan

69.0%

Shared gain

40.2%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

49.1%

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

Suriname

41.7%

Japan

56.6%

Shared gain

28.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

14.7%

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Suriname

17.3%

Japan

12.0%

Shared gain

0.0%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

13.0%

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Suriname

12.1%

Japan

14.0%

Shared gain

0.0%

Critical Resource and Energy Exchange

5.5%

Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.

Suriname

10.6%

Japan

0.5%

Shared gain

0.0%