Suriname vs Russia

Overall Mutual Score: 50.7%

Overall Fit Rank50.7%
Trade Pull8.8%
Mutual Win Potential38.6%
Risk Drag19.8%

Suriname profile

Market Size67.4%
Resource Strength17.8%
Tech Readiness89.0%
Human Capital86.0%
Infrastructure94.8%
Energy Position14.5%
Climate Pressure24.4%
Governance45.3%

Russia profile

Market Size90.2%
Resource Strength19.2%
Tech Readiness97.2%
Human Capital93.5%
Infrastructure69.8%
Energy Position3.5%
Climate Pressure84.0%
Governance27.1%

What These Countries Should Do Together

Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

59.3%

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Suriname

51.9%

Russia

66.7%

Shared gain

38.6%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

57.0%

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

Suriname

49.9%

Russia

64.1%

Shared gain

36.3%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

33.8%

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Suriname

33.1%

Russia

34.6%

Shared gain

13.8%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

15.9%

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Suriname

21.4%

Russia

10.3%

Shared gain

0.0%

Critical Resource and Energy Exchange

4.4%

Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.

Suriname

8.8%

Russia

0.0%

Shared gain

0.0%