Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration
58.6%
Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.
Sweden
49.2%
Bahamas
68.1%
Shared gain
37.5%
Sweden vs Bahamas
Overall Mutual Score: 43.6%
Overall Fit Rank43.6%
Trade Pull11.0%
Mutual Win Potential37.5%
Risk Drag14.0%
Sweden profile
Market Size82.0%
Resource Strength14.5%
Tech Readiness97.8%
Human Capital64.5%
Infrastructure100.0%
Energy Position57.9%
Climate Pressure21.4%
Governance86.3%
Bahamas profile
Market Size68.4%
Resource Strength8.7%
Tech Readiness97.4%
Human Capital60.8%
Infrastructure89.6%
Energy Position1.1%
Climate Pressure21.8%
Governance64.5%
What These Countries Should Do Together
Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.
Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership
41.2%
Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.
Sweden
33.8%
Bahamas
48.7%
Shared gain
19.9%
Technology Transfer and Joint R&D
10.5%
Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.
Sweden
11.7%
Bahamas
9.4%
Shared gain
0.0%
Critical Resource and Energy Exchange
8.8%
Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.
Sweden
12.2%
Bahamas
5.4%
Shared gain
0.0%
Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact
2.0%
Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.
Sweden
0.0%
Bahamas
4.0%
Shared gain
0.0%