Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration
64.2%
Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.
Sweden
56.3%
Peru
72.0%
Shared gain
43.5%
Sweden vs Peru
Overall Mutual Score: 47.8%
Overall Fit Rank47.8%
Trade Pull8.3%
Mutual Win Potential43.5%
Risk Drag13.4%
Sweden profile
Market Size82.0%
Resource Strength14.5%
Tech Readiness97.8%
Human Capital64.5%
Infrastructure100.0%
Energy Position57.9%
Climate Pressure21.4%
Governance86.3%
Peru profile
Market Size83.6%
Resource Strength17.4%
Tech Readiness89.1%
Human Capital89.0%
Infrastructure73.8%
Energy Position30.6%
Climate Pressure12.1%
Governance37.4%
What These Countries Should Do Together
Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.
Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership
51.5%
Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.
Sweden
44.0%
Peru
58.9%
Shared gain
30.6%
Technology Transfer and Joint R&D
17.8%
Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.
Sweden
20.4%
Peru
15.2%
Shared gain
0.0%
Critical Resource and Energy Exchange
8.7%
Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.
Sweden
11.6%
Peru
5.8%
Shared gain
0.0%
Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact
8.3%
Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.
Sweden
4.1%
Peru
12.4%
Shared gain
0.0%