Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration
62.8%
Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.
Sweden
61.2%
Sudan
64.3%
Shared gain
42.7%
Sweden vs Sudan
Overall Mutual Score: 45.1%
Overall Fit Rank45.1%
Trade Pull18.9%
Mutual Win Potential42.7%
Risk Drag25.5%
Sweden profile
Market Size82.0%
Resource Strength14.5%
Tech Readiness97.8%
Human Capital64.5%
Infrastructure100.0%
Energy Position57.9%
Climate Pressure21.4%
Governance86.3%
Sudan profile
Market Size81.7%
Resource Strength17.0%
Tech Readiness46.2%
Human Capital52.7%
Infrastructure34.0%
Energy Position61.0%
Climate Pressure2.6%
Governance18.2%
What These Countries Should Do Together
Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.
Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership
41.4%
Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.
Sweden
38.3%
Sudan
44.4%
Shared gain
21.1%
Technology Transfer and Joint R&D
36.6%
Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.
Sweden
37.9%
Sudan
35.2%
Shared gain
16.5%
Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact
13.7%
Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.
Sweden
8.0%
Sudan
19.4%
Shared gain
0.0%
Critical Resource and Energy Exchange
7.2%
Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.
Sweden
8.8%
Sudan
5.5%
Shared gain
0.0%