Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration
65.7%
Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.
Sweden
68.0%
South Sudan
63.5%
Shared gain
45.7%
Sweden vs South Sudan
Overall Mutual Score: 47.8%
Overall Fit Rank47.8%
Trade Pull14.3%
Mutual Win Potential45.7%
Risk Drag21.4%
Sweden profile
Market Size82.0%
Resource Strength14.5%
Tech Readiness97.8%
Human Capital64.5%
Infrastructure100.0%
Energy Position57.9%
Climate Pressure21.4%
Governance86.3%
South Sudan profile
Market Size76.0%
Resource Strength11.8%
Tech Readiness7.3%
Human Capital34.6%
Infrastructure35.5%
Energy Position32.4%
Climate Pressure0.0%
Governance8.9%
What These Countries Should Do Together
Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.
Technology Transfer and Joint R&D
58.6%
Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.
Sweden
60.2%
South Sudan
57.0%
Shared gain
38.6%
Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership
40.7%
Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.
Sweden
41.8%
South Sudan
39.5%
Shared gain
20.7%
Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact
14.4%
Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.
Sweden
10.2%
South Sudan
18.7%
Shared gain
0.0%
Critical Resource and Energy Exchange
6.8%
Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.
Sweden
9.3%
South Sudan
4.2%
Shared gain
0.0%