Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration
59.4%
Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.
Sweden
50.6%
Suriname
68.3%
Shared gain
38.4%
Sweden vs Suriname
Overall Mutual Score: 46.5%
Overall Fit Rank46.5%
Trade Pull9.7%
Mutual Win Potential38.4%
Risk Drag13.8%
Sweden profile
Market Size82.0%
Resource Strength14.5%
Tech Readiness97.8%
Human Capital64.5%
Infrastructure100.0%
Energy Position57.9%
Climate Pressure21.4%
Governance86.3%
Suriname profile
Market Size67.4%
Resource Strength17.8%
Tech Readiness89.0%
Human Capital86.0%
Infrastructure94.8%
Energy Position14.5%
Climate Pressure24.4%
Governance45.3%
What These Countries Should Do Together
Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.
Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership
49.6%
Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.
Sweden
43.0%
Suriname
56.2%
Shared gain
28.9%
Technology Transfer and Joint R&D
16.6%
Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.
Sweden
19.9%
Suriname
13.2%
Shared gain
0.0%
Critical Resource and Energy Exchange
7.7%
Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.
Sweden
10.6%
Suriname
4.8%
Shared gain
0.0%
Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact
3.6%
Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.
Sweden
0.4%
Suriname
6.9%
Shared gain
0.0%