Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration
63.6%
Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.
Sweden
54.9%
Uzbekistan
72.3%
Shared gain
42.7%
Sweden vs Uzbekistan
Overall Mutual Score: 49.1%
Overall Fit Rank49.1%
Trade Pull24.5%
Mutual Win Potential42.7%
Risk Drag12.9%
Sweden profile
Market Size82.0%
Resource Strength14.5%
Tech Readiness97.8%
Human Capital64.5%
Infrastructure100.0%
Energy Position57.9%
Climate Pressure21.4%
Governance86.3%
Uzbekistan profile
Market Size82.2%
Resource Strength18.6%
Tech Readiness94.5%
Human Capital91.4%
Infrastructure80.4%
Energy Position1.0%
Climate Pressure24.5%
Governance33.6%
What These Countries Should Do Together
Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.
Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership
51.7%
Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.
Sweden
43.8%
Uzbekistan
59.6%
Shared gain
30.7%
Technology Transfer and Joint R&D
15.2%
Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.
Sweden
17.6%
Uzbekistan
12.9%
Shared gain
0.0%
Critical Resource and Energy Exchange
8.4%
Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.
Sweden
12.4%
Uzbekistan
4.5%
Shared gain
0.0%
Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact
3.3%
Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.
Sweden
0.7%
Uzbekistan
5.8%
Shared gain
0.0%