Turkey vs South Sudan

Overall Mutual Score: 48.0%

Overall Fit Rank48.0%
Trade Pull23.8%
Mutual Win Potential43.4%
Risk Drag32.8%

Turkey profile

Market Size88.2%
Resource Strength19.4%
Tech Readiness93.7%
Human Capital91.8%
Infrastructure77.3%
Energy Position12.0%
Climate Pressure32.3%
Governance39.9%

South Sudan profile

Market Size76.0%
Resource Strength11.8%
Tech Readiness7.3%
Human Capital34.6%
Infrastructure35.5%
Energy Position32.4%
Climate Pressure0.0%
Governance8.9%

What These Countries Should Do Together

Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

63.5%

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Turkey

66.5%

South Sudan

60.5%

Shared gain

43.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

53.9%

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Turkey

57.7%

South Sudan

50.1%

Shared gain

33.7%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

45.6%

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

Turkey

46.0%

South Sudan

45.2%

Shared gain

25.6%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

17.4%

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Turkey

15.9%

South Sudan

18.9%

Shared gain

0.0%

Critical Resource and Energy Exchange

6.2%

Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.

Turkey

10.6%

South Sudan

1.7%

Shared gain

0.0%