Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration
64.0%
Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.
Turkey
55.6%
Sweden
72.5%
Shared gain
43.2%
Turkey vs Sweden
Overall Mutual Score: 51.1%
Overall Fit Rank51.1%
Trade Pull44.7%
Mutual Win Potential43.2%
Risk Drag19.2%
Turkey profile
Market Size88.2%
Resource Strength19.4%
Tech Readiness93.7%
Human Capital91.8%
Infrastructure77.3%
Energy Position12.0%
Climate Pressure32.3%
Governance39.9%
Sweden profile
Market Size82.0%
Resource Strength14.5%
Tech Readiness97.8%
Human Capital64.5%
Infrastructure100.0%
Energy Position57.9%
Climate Pressure21.4%
Governance86.3%
What These Countries Should Do Together
Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.
Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership
50.4%
Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.
Turkey
42.3%
Sweden
58.5%
Shared gain
29.3%
Technology Transfer and Joint R&D
14.7%
Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.
Turkey
16.2%
Sweden
13.2%
Shared gain
0.0%
Critical Resource and Energy Exchange
8.3%
Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.
Turkey
12.1%
Sweden
4.6%
Shared gain
0.0%
Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact
7.6%
Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.
Turkey
4.6%
Sweden
10.6%
Shared gain
0.0%