Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration
67.2%
Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.
United States
59.2%
Sweden
75.2%
Shared gain
46.5%
United States vs Sweden
Overall Mutual Score: 52.2%
Overall Fit Rank52.2%
Trade Pull17.6%
Mutual Win Potential46.5%
Risk Drag13.9%
United States profile
Market Size96.4%
Resource Strength22.3%
Tech Readiness96.6%
Human Capital61.8%
Infrastructure62.7%
Energy Position10.9%
Climate Pressure81.7%
Governance74.5%
Sweden profile
Market Size82.0%
Resource Strength14.5%
Tech Readiness97.8%
Human Capital64.5%
Infrastructure100.0%
Energy Position57.9%
Climate Pressure21.4%
Governance86.3%
What These Countries Should Do Together
Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.
Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership
43.0%
Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.
United States
34.2%
Sweden
51.8%
Shared gain
21.3%
Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact
38.3%
Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.
United States
35.7%
Sweden
41.0%
Shared gain
18.1%
Technology Transfer and Joint R&D
14.0%
Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.
United States
12.3%
Sweden
15.6%
Shared gain
0.0%
Critical Resource and Energy Exchange
11.6%
Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.
United States
15.7%
Sweden
7.5%
Shared gain
0.0%