American Samoa

AS / ASM

Economic

GDP Nominal
$871,000,000
GDP per Capita
$18,017.46
Growth Rate
1.74%
Inflation Rate
N/A
Unemployment Rate
N/A
Exports
$409,000,000
Imports
$677,000,000
Trade Balance
$-268,000,000

Demographic

Population
46,765 people
Population Growth
-1.6%
Population Density
237.61 /km²
Urbanization Rate
80.94%
Life Expectancy
72.85 years
Literacy Rate
97.34%
Languages
English, Samoan

Technology & Infrastructure

Internet Penetration
0%
Electricity Access
N/A
R&D Expenditure
0.4% of GDP
Patents Filed
N/A

Environment & Resources

CO2 Emissions per Capita
0 t/person
Renewable Energy Share
0.4%
Forest Cover
85.2%
Freshwater Availability
N/A

Top Matched Partner Countries

Strategy: Technology First | Average score 38.0 | Confidence 70.9

Showing 50 of 214 partners (page 1 of 5)

United Arab Emirates (ARE)

57.6%

Overall Fit Rank59.9%
Trade Pull4.7%
Mutual Win Potential51.2%
Confidence76.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 78.2% | United Arab Emirates payoff 65.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 67.7% | United Arab Emirates payoff 62.7%

Open full comparison

Qatar (QAT)

56.3%

Overall Fit Rank59.8%
Trade Pull4.5%
Mutual Win Potential50.8%
Confidence69.0%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 78.1% | Qatar payoff 64.4%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 66.1% | Qatar payoff 61.1%

Open full comparison

Kuwait (KWT)

56.3%

Overall Fit Rank59.0%
Trade Pull4.3%
Mutual Win Potential49.4%
Confidence73.8%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 77.6% | Kuwait payoff 62.4%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 65.9% | Kuwait payoff 60.9%

Open full comparison

Oman (OMN)

56.1%

Overall Fit Rank59.3%
Trade Pull4.6%
Mutual Win Potential48.6%
Confidence73.8%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 76.0% | Oman payoff 62.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 65.4% | Oman payoff 60.9%

Open full comparison

Saudi Arabia (SAU)

55.6%

Overall Fit Rank58.6%
Trade Pull4.6%
Mutual Win Potential51.1%
Confidence73.8%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 77.6% | Saudi Arabia payoff 65.3%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 68.8% | Saudi Arabia payoff 61.6%

Open full comparison

Bahrain (BHR)

55.5%

Overall Fit Rank59.7%
Trade Pull4.2%
Mutual Win Potential48.0%
Confidence73.8%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 76.0% | Bahrain payoff 61.1%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

American Samoa payoff 64.0% | Bahrain payoff 57.2%

Open full comparison

Brunei (BRN)

53.9%

Overall Fit Rank56.1%
Trade Pull7.8%
Mutual Win Potential49.5%
Confidence69.0%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 77.3% | Brunei payoff 62.8%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

American Samoa payoff 64.8% | Brunei payoff 57.6%

Open full comparison

Canada (CAN)

52.5%

Overall Fit Rank58.8%
Trade Pull6.7%
Mutual Win Potential46.9%
Confidence76.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 70.7% | Canada payoff 63.4%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 67.9% | Canada payoff 61.8%

Open full comparison

Russia (RUS)

52.4%

Overall Fit Rank53.8%
Trade Pull5.1%
Mutual Win Potential48.2%
Confidence78.6%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 74.0% | Russia payoff 63.0%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 68.5% | Russia payoff 61.0%

Open full comparison

South Korea (KOR)

52.4%

Overall Fit Rank48.5%
Trade Pull9.1%
Mutual Win Potential52.3%
Confidence78.6%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 76.5% | South Korea payoff 68.4%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 68.7% | South Korea payoff 63.1%

Open full comparison

Australia (AUS)

52.3%

Overall Fit Rank55.6%
Trade Pull17.8%
Mutual Win Potential48.3%
Confidence76.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 72.2% | Australia payoff 64.8%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 68.1% | Australia payoff 60.7%

Open full comparison

New Caledonia (NCL)

51.4%

Overall Fit Rank60.0%
Trade Pull26.1%
Mutual Win Potential40.9%
Confidence61.9%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 69.2% | New Caledonia payoff 54.0%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

American Samoa payoff 59.3% | New Caledonia payoff 58.8%

Open full comparison

United States (USA)

51.3%

Overall Fit Rank56.5%
Trade Pull7.5%
Mutual Win Potential47.1%
Confidence76.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 69.6% | United States payoff 64.8%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 70.5% | United States payoff 62.4%

Open full comparison

Kazakhstan (KAZ)

51.0%

Overall Fit Rank50.4%
Trade Pull5.4%
Mutual Win Potential47.1%
Confidence78.6%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 73.9% | Kazakhstan payoff 61.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 65.8% | Kazakhstan payoff 59.3%

Open full comparison

Trinidad and Tobago (TTO)

50.9%

Overall Fit Rank57.6%
Trade Pull5.3%
Mutual Win Potential43.1%
Confidence73.8%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 71.0% | Trinidad and Tobago payoff 56.4%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

American Samoa payoff 59.7% | Trinidad and Tobago payoff 58.7%

Open full comparison

Iceland (ISL)

50.6%

Overall Fit Rank62.4%
Trade Pull4.6%
Mutual Win Potential48.1%
Confidence69.0%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 72.6% | Iceland payoff 64.0%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 62.1% | Iceland payoff 56.4%

Open full comparison

Singapore (SGP)

50.2%

Overall Fit Rank46.4%
Trade Pull7.9%
Mutual Win Potential48.8%
Confidence71.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 74.8% | Singapore payoff 63.4%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 65.5% | Singapore payoff 61.0%

Open full comparison

China (CHN)

50.1%

Overall Fit Rank45.8%
Trade Pull8.8%
Mutual Win Potential49.5%
Confidence76.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 74.5% | China payoff 65.0%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 72.4% | China payoff 65.0%

Open full comparison

Norway (NOR)

48.8%

Overall Fit Rank50.2%
Trade Pull4.8%
Mutual Win Potential49.3%
Confidence76.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 73.5% | Norway payoff 65.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 66.7% | Norway payoff 60.9%

Open full comparison

Luxembourg (LUX)

48.3%

Overall Fit Rank48.0%
Trade Pull4.1%
Mutual Win Potential49.0%
Confidence69.0%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 73.8% | Luxembourg payoff 64.6%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 64.3% | Luxembourg payoff 59.5%

Open full comparison

Malaysia (MYS)

48.1%

Overall Fit Rank38.3%
Trade Pull7.5%
Mutual Win Potential49.1%
Confidence78.6%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 75.5% | Malaysia payoff 63.4%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 67.0% | Malaysia payoff 62.2%

Open full comparison

Estonia (EST)

47.4%

Overall Fit Rank42.8%
Trade Pull4.4%
Mutual Win Potential48.1%
Confidence71.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 75.1% | Estonia payoff 62.0%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 63.5% | Estonia payoff 59.3%

Open full comparison

Poland (POL)

46.7%

Overall Fit Rank36.9%
Trade Pull4.6%
Mutual Win Potential46.4%
Confidence78.6%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 72.5% | Poland payoff 61.0%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 66.6% | Poland payoff 62.7%

Open full comparison

Palau (PLW)

46.4%

Overall Fit Rank55.0%
Trade Pull8.6%
Mutual Win Potential38.4%
Confidence66.7%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

American Samoa payoff 58.3% | Palau payoff 58.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 49.5% | Palau payoff 51.8%

Open full comparison

Slovenia (SVN)

45.5%

Overall Fit Rank34.1%
Trade Pull4.0%
Mutual Win Potential48.1%
Confidence78.6%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 74.6% | Slovenia payoff 62.3%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 63.9% | Slovenia payoff 59.8%

Open full comparison

Germany (DEU)

45.4%

Overall Fit Rank37.1%
Trade Pull4.9%
Mutual Win Potential48.7%
Confidence76.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 71.6% | Germany payoff 66.0%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 69.8% | Germany payoff 64.4%

Open full comparison

Japan (JPN)

45.4%

Overall Fit Rank39.0%
Trade Pull10.8%
Mutual Win Potential47.2%
Confidence73.8%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 69.9% | Japan payoff 64.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 69.7% | Japan payoff 63.3%

Open full comparison

Belgium (BEL)

45.2%

Overall Fit Rank37.0%
Trade Pull4.5%
Mutual Win Potential48.9%
Confidence71.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 72.4% | Belgium payoff 65.6%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 67.3% | Belgium payoff 62.7%

Open full comparison

Austria (AUT)

45.0%

Overall Fit Rank38.6%
Trade Pull4.4%
Mutual Win Potential48.8%
Confidence71.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 72.2% | Austria payoff 65.6%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 67.0% | Austria payoff 62.5%

Open full comparison

Greenland (GRL)

45.0%

Overall Fit Rank50.2%
Trade Pull4.6%
Mutual Win Potential37.9%
Confidence59.5%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 63.5% | Greenland payoff 53.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 57.8% | Greenland payoff 55.4%

Open full comparison

Bosnia and Herzegovina (BIH)

44.8%

Overall Fit Rank38.8%
Trade Pull3.8%
Mutual Win Potential43.6%
Confidence73.8%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 70.9% | Bosnia and Herzegovina payoff 57.3%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 61.8% | Bosnia and Herzegovina payoff 58.0%

Open full comparison

Iran (IRN)

44.6%

Overall Fit Rank39.3%
Trade Pull4.7%
Mutual Win Potential41.8%
Confidence76.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 64.6% | Iran payoff 59.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 67.2% | Iran payoff 56.2%

Open full comparison

Mongolia (MNG)

44.5%

Overall Fit Rank35.3%
Trade Pull6.2%
Mutual Win Potential42.7%
Confidence76.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 69.9% | Mongolia payoff 56.6%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 61.6% | Mongolia payoff 58.3%

Open full comparison

Czechia (CZE)

44.5%

Overall Fit Rank36.2%
Trade Pull4.4%
Mutual Win Potential45.3%
Confidence76.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 69.4% | Czechia payoff 61.6%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 65.9% | Czechia payoff 62.1%

Open full comparison

Netherlands (NLD)

44.5%

Overall Fit Rank34.4%
Trade Pull4.7%
Mutual Win Potential48.5%
Confidence73.8%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 72.2% | Netherlands payoff 65.0%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 67.6% | Netherlands payoff 62.9%

Open full comparison

Israel (ISR)

44.3%

Overall Fit Rank35.3%
Trade Pull4.2%
Mutual Win Potential47.4%
Confidence76.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 72.0% | Israel payoff 63.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 64.9% | Israel payoff 58.8%

Open full comparison

New Zealand (NZL)

43.9%

Overall Fit Rank34.6%
Trade Pull23.3%
Mutual Win Potential47.6%
Confidence76.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 72.0% | New Zealand payoff 63.6%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 65.6% | New Zealand payoff 58.6%

Open full comparison

Cyprus (CYP)

43.9%

Overall Fit Rank33.0%
Trade Pull3.8%
Mutual Win Potential45.7%
Confidence71.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 73.7% | Cyprus payoff 58.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 62.4% | Cyprus payoff 58.2%

Open full comparison

Finland (FIN)

43.8%

Overall Fit Rank39.7%
Trade Pull4.8%
Mutual Win Potential47.3%
Confidence71.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 70.8% | Finland payoff 63.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 65.3% | Finland payoff 60.2%

Open full comparison

Croatia (HRV)

43.8%

Overall Fit Rank33.1%
Trade Pull4.0%
Mutual Win Potential44.8%
Confidence73.8%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 71.7% | Croatia payoff 58.8%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 63.6% | Croatia payoff 60.3%

Open full comparison

Aruba (ABW)

43.8%

Overall Fit Rank33.5%
Trade Pull5.3%
Mutual Win Potential48.8%
Confidence64.3%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 76.8% | Aruba payoff 61.9%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

American Samoa payoff 64.8% | Aruba payoff 57.2%

Open full comparison

Belarus (BLR)

43.7%

Overall Fit Rank29.9%
Trade Pull4.3%
Mutual Win Potential47.0%
Confidence76.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 73.9% | Belarus payoff 61.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 64.2% | Belarus payoff 59.8%

Open full comparison

Sweden (SWE)

43.6%

Overall Fit Rank37.2%
Trade Pull4.8%
Mutual Win Potential49.1%
Confidence69.0%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 72.5% | Sweden payoff 65.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 67.2% | Sweden payoff 62.7%

Open full comparison

Hong Kong (HKG)

43.6%

Overall Fit Rank33.3%
Trade Pull8.2%
Mutual Win Potential48.5%
Confidence64.3%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 73.0% | Hong Kong payoff 64.3%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 67.0% | Hong Kong payoff 62.4%

Open full comparison

Vietnam (VNM)

43.5%

Overall Fit Rank28.3%
Trade Pull7.5%
Mutual Win Potential45.5%
Confidence76.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 67.2% | Vietnam payoff 63.8%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 71.5% | Vietnam payoff 59.2%

Open full comparison

Ireland (IRL)

43.4%

Overall Fit Rank31.4%
Trade Pull4.6%
Mutual Win Potential48.2%
Confidence71.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 73.0% | Ireland payoff 63.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 66.9% | Ireland payoff 62.3%

Open full comparison

Latvia (LVA)

43.3%

Overall Fit Rank31.3%
Trade Pull4.3%
Mutual Win Potential47.9%
Confidence73.8%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 74.9% | Latvia payoff 61.8%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 63.7% | Latvia payoff 59.4%

Open full comparison

Lithuania (LTU)

43.1%

Overall Fit Rank30.6%
Trade Pull4.3%
Mutual Win Potential46.8%
Confidence71.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 73.8% | Lithuania payoff 60.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 64.2% | Lithuania payoff 60.3%

Open full comparison

Denmark (DNK)

43.1%

Overall Fit Rank33.4%
Trade Pull4.6%
Mutual Win Potential49.3%
Confidence73.8%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 73.0% | Denmark payoff 65.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 66.2% | Denmark payoff 61.2%

Open full comparison

Chile (CHL)

43.1%

Overall Fit Rank27.6%
Trade Pull7.3%
Mutual Win Potential48.2%
Confidence78.6%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

American Samoa payoff 75.1% | Chile payoff 62.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

American Samoa payoff 66.5% | Chile payoff 60.3%

Open full comparison