Economic

GDP Nominal
$1,757,022,451,652.83
GDP per Capita
$64,603.99
Growth Rate
1.37%
Inflation Rate
3.16%
Unemployment Rate
4.09%
Exports
$432,605,705,549.39
Imports
$395,749,225,409.46
Trade Balance
$36,856,480,139.93

Demographic

Population
27,196,812 people
Population Growth
1.99%
Population Density
3.47 /km²
Urbanization Rate
87.6%
Life Expectancy
83.05 years
Literacy Rate
N/A
Languages
English

Technology & Infrastructure

Internet Penetration
97.06%
Electricity Access
100%
R&D Expenditure
1.86% of GDP
Patents Filed
2,966

Environment & Resources

CO2 Emissions per Capita
14.1 t/person
Renewable Energy Share
12.3%
Forest Cover
17.42%
Freshwater Availability
11.62 km³

Top Matched Partner Countries

Strategy: Balanced | Average score 37.8 | Confidence 84.2

Showing 50 of 249 partners (page 1 of 5)

Central African Republic (CAF)

51.9%

Overall Fit Rank78.2%
Trade Pull5.8%
Mutual Win Potential45.0%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 68.4% | Central African Republic payoff 61.8%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Australia payoff 59.8% | Central African Republic payoff 55.2%

Open full comparison

DR Congo (COD)

51.8%

Overall Fit Rank66.4%
Trade Pull6.8%
Mutual Win Potential49.3%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 69.8% | DR Congo payoff 68.8%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 48.5% | DR Congo payoff 58.9%

Open full comparison

Niger (NER)

51.5%

Overall Fit Rank71.1%
Trade Pull5.4%
Mutual Win Potential47.1%
Confidence95.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 69.5% | Niger payoff 64.9%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 49.5% | Niger payoff 57.4%

Open full comparison

Mozambique (MOZ)

50.8%

Overall Fit Rank63.6%
Trade Pull8.6%
Mutual Win Potential47.0%
Confidence97.6%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 67.1% | Mozambique payoff 66.9%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 47.6% | Mozambique payoff 55.7%

Open full comparison

Madagascar (MDG)

50.2%

Overall Fit Rank65.4%
Trade Pull9.1%
Mutual Win Potential46.7%
Confidence90.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 67.5% | Madagascar payoff 65.9%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 48.7% | Madagascar payoff 57.4%

Open full comparison

Chad (TCD)

49.4%

Overall Fit Rank65.6%
Trade Pull5.8%
Mutual Win Potential47.1%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 70.6% | Chad payoff 63.8%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Australia payoff 59.5% | Chad payoff 55.7%

Open full comparison

Tanzania (TZA)

49.3%

Overall Fit Rank59.8%
Trade Pull8.0%
Mutual Win Potential47.9%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 67.9% | Tanzania payoff 67.8%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 48.4% | Tanzania payoff 56.8%

Open full comparison

Uganda (UGA)

48.8%

Overall Fit Rank61.6%
Trade Pull7.4%
Mutual Win Potential47.3%
Confidence90.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 68.1% | Uganda payoff 66.5%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 47.7% | Uganda payoff 57.9%

Open full comparison

Ethiopia (ETH)

48.8%

Overall Fit Rank63.8%
Trade Pull7.7%
Mutual Win Potential47.1%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 67.9% | Ethiopia payoff 66.4%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 48.0% | Ethiopia payoff 57.7%

Open full comparison

Republic of the Congo (COG)

48.3%

Overall Fit Rank59.0%
Trade Pull6.4%
Mutual Win Potential43.8%
Confidence95.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 61.9% | Republic of the Congo payoff 65.8%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 44.2% | Republic of the Congo payoff 51.3%

Open full comparison

Somalia (SOM)

48.2%

Overall Fit Rank60.4%
Trade Pull7.6%
Mutual Win Potential45.5%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 64.1% | Somalia payoff 67.0%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 47.8% | Somalia payoff 58.4%

Open full comparison

Burkina Faso (BFA)

47.9%

Overall Fit Rank60.5%
Trade Pull5.3%
Mutual Win Potential46.8%
Confidence90.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 69.1% | Burkina Faso payoff 64.7%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Australia payoff 55.8% | Burkina Faso payoff 51.6%

Open full comparison

Papua New Guinea (PNG)

47.9%

Overall Fit Rank53.1%
Trade Pull33.8%
Mutual Win Potential45.2%
Confidence95.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 68.3% | Papua New Guinea payoff 62.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Australia payoff 56.9% | Papua New Guinea payoff 50.2%

Open full comparison

Zambia (ZMB)

47.4%

Overall Fit Rank57.8%
Trade Pull7.7%
Mutual Win Potential44.5%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 63.7% | Zambia payoff 65.4%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 46.0% | Zambia payoff 55.2%

Open full comparison

Burundi (BDI)

47.3%

Overall Fit Rank65.5%
Trade Pull6.5%
Mutual Win Potential44.0%
Confidence85.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 69.0% | Burundi payoff 59.5%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Australia payoff 61.7% | Burundi payoff 56.1%

Open full comparison

Nigeria (NGA)

47.2%

Overall Fit Rank59.8%
Trade Pull6.3%
Mutual Win Potential45.9%
Confidence95.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 65.5% | Nigeria payoff 66.3%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 47.1% | Nigeria payoff 55.0%

Open full comparison

Malawi (MWI)

46.9%

Overall Fit Rank57.4%
Trade Pull7.7%
Mutual Win Potential44.9%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 67.8% | Malawi payoff 62.1%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Australia payoff 57.4% | Malawi payoff 51.6%

Open full comparison

Guinea (GIN)

46.8%

Overall Fit Rank53.9%
Trade Pull5.2%
Mutual Win Potential46.6%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 65.2% | Guinea payoff 68.1%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 47.6% | Guinea payoff 55.0%

Open full comparison

Rwanda (RWA)

46.7%

Overall Fit Rank52.9%
Trade Pull6.9%
Mutual Win Potential44.7%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 62.7% | Rwanda payoff 66.8%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 47.8% | Rwanda payoff 56.9%

Open full comparison

Guinea-Bissau (GNB)

46.7%

Overall Fit Rank61.1%
Trade Pull4.5%
Mutual Win Potential42.4%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 63.0% | Guinea-Bissau payoff 61.9%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 48.3% | Guinea-Bissau payoff 57.9%

Open full comparison

American Samoa (ASM)

46.6%

Overall Fit Rank49.8%
Trade Pull17.8%
Mutual Win Potential48.3%
Confidence76.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Australia payoff 72.2% | American Samoa payoff 64.8%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 68.1% | American Samoa payoff 60.7%

Open full comparison

Eritrea (ERI)

46.6%

Overall Fit Rank59.6%
Trade Pull6.2%
Mutual Win Potential43.1%
Confidence85.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 63.0% | Eritrea payoff 63.2%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 48.1% | Eritrea payoff 56.9%

Open full comparison

Liberia (LBR)

46.6%

Overall Fit Rank64.3%
Trade Pull5.0%
Mutual Win Potential43.2%
Confidence85.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 65.8% | Liberia payoff 60.7%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 48.2% | Liberia payoff 58.4%

Open full comparison

Mali (MLI)

46.4%

Overall Fit Rank56.2%
Trade Pull5.2%
Mutual Win Potential45.8%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 64.9% | Mali payoff 66.7%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 48.4% | Mali payoff 55.9%

Open full comparison

Zimbabwe (ZWE)

46.0%

Overall Fit Rank55.4%
Trade Pull8.2%
Mutual Win Potential43.2%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 61.8% | Zimbabwe payoff 64.7%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 45.1% | Zimbabwe payoff 54.1%

Open full comparison

Cameroon (CMR)

45.6%

Overall Fit Rank52.8%
Trade Pull6.2%
Mutual Win Potential43.7%
Confidence95.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 61.6% | Cameroon payoff 66.0%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 47.1% | Cameroon payoff 55.7%

Open full comparison

Togo (TGO)

45.5%

Overall Fit Rank52.1%
Trade Pull5.4%
Mutual Win Potential44.5%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 63.2% | Togo payoff 65.9%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 47.9% | Togo payoff 56.5%

Open full comparison

Sierra Leone (SLE)

45.4%

Overall Fit Rank56.6%
Trade Pull4.9%
Mutual Win Potential44.0%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 65.5% | Sierra Leone payoff 62.6%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 47.4% | Sierra Leone payoff 55.7%

Open full comparison

Kenya (KEN)

45.4%

Overall Fit Rank48.8%
Trade Pull8.0%
Mutual Win Potential46.5%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 64.2% | Kenya payoff 68.8%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 47.9% | Kenya payoff 55.2%

Open full comparison

Gabon (GAB)

44.9%

Overall Fit Rank50.2%
Trade Pull6.1%
Mutual Win Potential40.5%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 54.3% | Gabon payoff 67.8%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

Australia payoff 41.6% | Gabon payoff 54.4%

Open full comparison

Angola (AGO)

44.5%

Overall Fit Rank48.1%
Trade Pull7.0%
Mutual Win Potential44.7%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 63.6% | Angola payoff 65.9%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 46.0% | Angola payoff 51.4%

Open full comparison

South Sudan (SSD)

44.4%

Overall Fit Rank51.5%
Trade Pull6.7%
Mutual Win Potential45.0%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 68.9% | South Sudan payoff 61.5%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Australia payoff 59.9% | South Sudan payoff 56.0%

Open full comparison

Benin (BEN)

44.3%

Overall Fit Rank47.8%
Trade Pull5.6%
Mutual Win Potential45.6%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 64.8% | Benin payoff 66.3%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 47.8% | Benin payoff 53.8%

Open full comparison

Haiti (HTI)

43.8%

Overall Fit Rank53.5%
Trade Pull5.6%
Mutual Win Potential42.3%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 62.1% | Haiti payoff 62.5%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 46.5% | Haiti payoff 55.2%

Open full comparison

Solomon Islands (SLB)

43.4%

Overall Fit Rank36.7%
Trade Pull27.7%
Mutual Win Potential41.5%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 57.2% | Solomon Islands payoff 66.3%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 47.5% | Solomon Islands payoff 53.5%

Open full comparison

Ivory Coast (CIV)

43.3%

Overall Fit Rank43.2%
Trade Pull5.8%
Mutual Win Potential44.7%
Confidence95.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 62.2% | Ivory Coast payoff 67.3%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 46.2% | Ivory Coast payoff 52.8%

Open full comparison

Mauritania (MRT)

43.1%

Overall Fit Rank38.5%
Trade Pull4.7%
Mutual Win Potential44.7%
Confidence90.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 63.0% | Mauritania payoff 66.6%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 46.3% | Mauritania payoff 48.1%

Open full comparison

Nepal (NPL)

42.8%

Overall Fit Rank42.5%
Trade Pull9.6%
Mutual Win Potential42.8%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 58.4% | Nepal payoff 67.7%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 46.2% | Nepal payoff 54.7%

Open full comparison

Eswatini (SWZ)

42.7%

Overall Fit Rank41.4%
Trade Pull8.0%
Mutual Win Potential39.6%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 54.3% | Eswatini payoff 65.6%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 44.9% | Eswatini payoff 52.1%

Open full comparison

Myanmar (MMR)

42.4%

Overall Fit Rank41.0%
Trade Pull11.4%
Mutual Win Potential43.5%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 61.1% | Myanmar payoff 66.1%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 46.5% | Myanmar payoff 53.8%

Open full comparison

Cambodia (KHM)

42.2%

Overall Fit Rank31.8%
Trade Pull13.7%
Mutual Win Potential43.8%
Confidence95.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 57.8% | Cambodia payoff 70.7%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 44.4% | Cambodia payoff 50.8%

Open full comparison

India (IND)

42.2%

Overall Fit Rank30.0%
Trade Pull10.6%
Mutual Win Potential48.2%
Confidence97.6%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 62.6% | India payoff 74.4%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

Australia payoff 41.3% | India payoff 56.8%

Open full comparison

Sudan (SDN)

42.1%

Overall Fit Rank48.3%
Trade Pull6.8%
Mutual Win Potential42.2%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 62.1% | Sudan payoff 62.4%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 45.4% | Sudan payoff 52.3%

Open full comparison

Nicaragua (NIC)

41.9%

Overall Fit Rank33.7%
Trade Pull6.2%
Mutual Win Potential43.0%
Confidence90.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 57.6% | Nicaragua payoff 69.2%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

Australia payoff 43.5% | Nicaragua payoff 54.6%

Open full comparison

Guatemala (GTM)

41.9%

Overall Fit Rank36.5%
Trade Pull6.8%
Mutual Win Potential43.4%
Confidence95.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 58.4% | Guatemala payoff 69.0%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 44.4% | Guatemala payoff 51.8%

Open full comparison

Lesotho (LSO)

41.6%

Overall Fit Rank34.3%
Trade Pull7.7%
Mutual Win Potential42.1%
Confidence90.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 59.2% | Lesotho payoff 65.2%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 46.9% | Lesotho payoff 51.3%

Open full comparison

Timor-Leste (TLS)

41.6%

Overall Fit Rank26.9%
Trade Pull22.5%
Mutual Win Potential42.0%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 56.9% | Timor-Leste payoff 67.7%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Australia payoff 48.2% | Timor-Leste payoff 49.4%

Open full comparison

Vanuatu (VUT)

41.5%

Overall Fit Rank35.1%
Trade Pull30.7%
Mutual Win Potential38.8%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 56.6% | Vanuatu payoff 61.1%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

Australia payoff 45.0% | Vanuatu payoff 50.9%

Open full comparison

Macau (MAC)

41.4%

Overall Fit Rank33.3%
Trade Pull12.9%
Mutual Win Potential40.7%
Confidence81.0%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 53.3% | Macau payoff 69.8%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

Australia payoff 45.7% | Macau payoff 60.7%

Open full comparison

Namibia (NAM)

41.4%

Overall Fit Rank32.4%
Trade Pull7.3%
Mutual Win Potential42.7%
Confidence90.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Australia payoff 59.1% | Namibia payoff 66.6%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

Australia payoff 45.6% | Namibia payoff 53.9%

Open full comparison