Economic

GDP Nominal
N/A
GDP per Capita
N/A
Growth Rate
N/A
Inflation Rate
N/A
Unemployment Rate
N/A
Exports
N/A
Imports
N/A
Trade Balance
N/A

Demographic

Population
2,608 people
Population Growth
N/A
Population Density
N/A
Urbanization Rate
N/A
Life Expectancy
N/A
Literacy Rate
N/A
Languages
English, Samoan, Tokelauan

Technology & Infrastructure

Internet Penetration
N/A
Electricity Access
N/A
R&D Expenditure
N/A
Patents Filed
N/A

Environment & Resources

CO2 Emissions per Capita
N/A
Renewable Energy Share
N/A
Forest Cover
N/A
Freshwater Availability
N/A

Top Matched Partner Countries

Strategy: Trade First | Average score 27.4 | Confidence 46.8

Showing 50 of 135 partners (page 2 of 3)

Portugal (PRT)

28.1%

Overall Fit Rank32.9%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential41.5%
Confidence47.6%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 63.9% | Portugal payoff 59.3%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 50.1% | Portugal payoff 40.7%

Open full comparison

Switzerland (CHE)

28.0%

Overall Fit Rank34.6%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential43.8%
Confidence45.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 63.5% | Switzerland payoff 64.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 51.8% | Switzerland payoff 42.1%

Open full comparison

Turkey (TUR)

27.9%

Overall Fit Rank33.7%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential38.4%
Confidence52.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 60.3% | Turkey payoff 56.6%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 50.0% | Turkey payoff 39.0%

Open full comparison

Romania (ROU)

27.9%

Overall Fit Rank30.9%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential41.7%
Confidence50.0%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 64.3% | Romania payoff 59.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 50.6% | Romania payoff 40.3%

Open full comparison

Israel (ISR)

27.9%

Overall Fit Rank35.7%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential41.6%
Confidence50.0%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 62.3% | Israel payoff 60.8%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 49.1% | Israel payoff 38.1%

Open full comparison

Chile (CHL)

27.8%

Overall Fit Rank31.4%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential42.6%
Confidence52.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 65.4% | Chile payoff 59.8%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 50.8% | Chile payoff 39.6%

Open full comparison

Libya (LBY)

27.7%

Overall Fit Rank39.8%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential29.0%
Confidence47.6%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 51.6% | Libya payoff 46.6%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 44.2% | Libya payoff 36.7%

Open full comparison

Slovakia (SVK)

27.5%

Overall Fit Rank34.3%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential39.4%
Confidence47.6%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 60.1% | Slovakia payoff 58.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 49.1% | Slovakia payoff 40.1%

Open full comparison

Seychelles (SYC)

27.5%

Overall Fit Rank36.8%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential38.4%
Confidence42.9%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 62.0% | Seychelles payoff 55.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 42.6% | Seychelles payoff 33.8%

Open full comparison

Greenland (GRL)

27.4%

Overall Fit Rank47.3%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential32.3%
Confidence33.3%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 53.9% | Greenland payoff 50.8%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 42.1% | Greenland payoff 34.7%

Open full comparison

Turkmenistan (TKM)

27.4%

Overall Fit Rank45.4%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential18.6%
Confidence45.2%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Tokelau payoff 41.0% | Turkmenistan payoff 36.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 41.3% | Turkmenistan payoff 35.6%

Open full comparison

Uruguay (URY)

27.2%

Overall Fit Rank37.4%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential40.5%
Confidence47.6%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 63.9% | Uruguay payoff 57.4%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 47.7% | Uruguay payoff 36.1%

Open full comparison

South Africa (ZAF)

27.2%

Overall Fit Rank37.3%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential29.5%
Confidence52.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 51.5% | South Africa payoff 47.6%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 46.4% | South Africa payoff 37.5%

Open full comparison

United Kingdom (GBR)

27.1%

Overall Fit Rank32.9%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential41.8%
Confidence50.0%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 61.2% | United Kingdom payoff 62.4%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 52.7% | United Kingdom payoff 41.2%

Open full comparison

Cyprus (CYP)

27.0%

Overall Fit Rank32.3%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential40.1%
Confidence45.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 64.0% | Cyprus payoff 56.6%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 46.6% | Cyprus payoff 37.5%

Open full comparison

Gabon (GAB)

26.9%

Overall Fit Rank43.3%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential30.1%
Confidence47.6%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 53.7% | Gabon payoff 47.0%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 43.6% | Gabon payoff 36.3%

Open full comparison

France (FRA)

26.9%

Overall Fit Rank32.3%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential40.6%
Confidence45.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 60.2% | France payoff 61.0%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 53.1% | France payoff 42.6%

Open full comparison

Brazil (BRA)

26.8%

Overall Fit Rank33.7%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential37.9%
Confidence52.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 59.9% | Brazil payoff 56.0%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 51.4% | Brazil payoff 39.7%

Open full comparison

Mexico (MEX)

26.7%

Overall Fit Rank27.6%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential36.8%
Confidence52.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 59.4% | Mexico payoff 54.4%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 51.1% | Mexico payoff 41.7%

Open full comparison

Bhutan (BTN)

26.6%

Overall Fit Rank42.1%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential37.6%
Confidence45.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 60.8% | Bhutan payoff 54.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 44.1% | Bhutan payoff 34.4%

Open full comparison

Georgia (GEO)

26.4%

Overall Fit Rank29.9%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential37.1%
Confidence52.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 60.2% | Georgia payoff 54.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 46.3% | Georgia payoff 38.1%

Open full comparison

Azerbaijan (AZE)

26.2%

Overall Fit Rank26.3%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential39.9%
Confidence50.0%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 63.0% | Azerbaijan payoff 57.0%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 48.5% | Azerbaijan payoff 38.8%

Open full comparison

India (IND)

26.1%

Overall Fit Rank30.4%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential33.6%
Confidence52.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 55.1% | India payoff 52.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 52.6% | India payoff 42.9%

Open full comparison

Puerto Rico (PRI)

26.0%

Overall Fit Rank28.4%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential39.3%
Confidence40.5%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 63.3% | Puerto Rico payoff 55.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 48.4% | Puerto Rico payoff 39.4%

Open full comparison

Uzbekistan (UZB)

26.0%

Overall Fit Rank26.8%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential39.9%
Confidence50.0%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 62.7% | Uzbekistan payoff 57.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 49.7% | Uzbekistan payoff 38.8%

Open full comparison

North Macedonia (MKD)

25.9%

Overall Fit Rank29.4%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential39.0%
Confidence45.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 62.1% | North Macedonia payoff 56.0%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 46.0% | North Macedonia payoff 37.3%

Open full comparison

Aruba (ABW)

25.5%

Overall Fit Rank30.6%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential43.2%
Confidence38.1%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 67.2% | Aruba payoff 59.6%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 45.2% | Aruba payoff 35.4%

Open full comparison

Iraq (IRQ)

25.4%

Overall Fit Rank29.3%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential35.3%
Confidence47.6%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 57.7% | Iraq payoff 53.0%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 48.1% | Iraq payoff 38.5%

Open full comparison

Paraguay (PRY)

25.4%

Overall Fit Rank33.1%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential36.8%
Confidence45.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 60.2% | Paraguay payoff 53.6%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 47.2% | Paraguay payoff 37.9%

Open full comparison

Indonesia (IDN)

25.3%

Overall Fit Rank26.9%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential34.5%
Confidence52.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 57.0% | Indonesia payoff 52.3%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 51.3% | Indonesia payoff 41.2%

Open full comparison

Hong Kong (HKG)

25.3%

Overall Fit Rank29.7%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential42.7%
Confidence38.1%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 63.3% | Hong Kong payoff 62.0%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 51.3% | Hong Kong payoff 41.7%

Open full comparison

Moldova (MDA)

25.1%

Overall Fit Rank27.7%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential36.7%
Confidence50.0%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 59.8% | Moldova payoff 53.8%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 45.7% | Moldova payoff 37.1%

Open full comparison

Philippines (PHL)

25.0%

Overall Fit Rank25.6%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential37.4%
Confidence52.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 60.0% | Philippines payoff 54.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 50.6% | Philippines payoff 40.6%

Open full comparison

Ukraine (UKR)

24.9%

Overall Fit Rank25.3%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential36.6%
Confidence52.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 59.2% | Ukraine payoff 54.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 48.3% | Ukraine payoff 38.9%

Open full comparison

Argentina (ARG)

24.8%

Overall Fit Rank27.5%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential39.1%
Confidence50.0%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 61.9% | Argentina payoff 56.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 49.8% | Argentina payoff 37.3%

Open full comparison

Costa Rica (CRI)

24.6%

Overall Fit Rank27.9%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential38.6%
Confidence45.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 62.1% | Costa Rica payoff 55.3%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 47.9% | Costa Rica payoff 37.9%

Open full comparison

Peru (PER)

24.4%

Overall Fit Rank26.4%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential35.9%
Confidence52.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 59.0% | Peru payoff 53.0%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 48.9% | Peru payoff 38.5%

Open full comparison

Dominican Republic (DOM)

24.4%

Overall Fit Rank25.3%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential39.8%
Confidence45.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 63.4% | Dominican Republic payoff 56.6%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 49.2% | Dominican Republic payoff 37.7%

Open full comparison

Gibraltar (GIB)

24.4%

Overall Fit Rank56.0%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential38.8%
Confidence14.3%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 60.9% | Gibraltar payoff 56.8%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Tokelau payoff 55.4% | Gibraltar payoff 55.4%

Open full comparison

Albania (ALB)

24.4%

Overall Fit Rank29.1%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential36.2%
Confidence52.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 59.7% | Albania payoff 53.0%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 45.0% | Albania payoff 35.6%

Open full comparison

Morocco (MAR)

24.3%

Overall Fit Rank23.1%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential39.5%
Confidence50.0%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 61.5% | Morocco payoff 57.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 49.7% | Morocco payoff 40.2%

Open full comparison

Kyrgyzstan (KGZ)

24.2%

Overall Fit Rank24.3%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential38.4%
Confidence52.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 61.5% | Kyrgyzstan payoff 55.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 46.4% | Kyrgyzstan payoff 37.6%

Open full comparison

Suriname (SUR)

24.2%

Overall Fit Rank27.4%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential34.5%
Confidence47.6%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 58.4% | Suriname payoff 50.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 43.1% | Suriname payoff 34.8%

Open full comparison

Malta (MLT)

24.2%

Overall Fit Rank24.5%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential41.1%
Confidence45.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 64.7% | Malta payoff 57.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 46.2% | Malta payoff 37.0%

Open full comparison

Serbia (SRB)

24.0%

Overall Fit Rank23.8%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential39.9%
Confidence47.6%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 62.8% | Serbia payoff 57.3%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 48.3% | Serbia payoff 39.5%

Open full comparison

Laos (LAO)

23.8%

Overall Fit Rank33.6%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential27.9%
Confidence45.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 51.2% | Laos payoff 45.0%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 44.0% | Laos payoff 36.4%

Open full comparison

Mauritius (MUS)

23.8%

Overall Fit Rank25.6%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential35.8%
Confidence45.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 59.3% | Mauritius payoff 52.6%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 44.8% | Mauritius payoff 36.8%

Open full comparison

Colombia (COL)

23.7%

Overall Fit Rank26.6%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential34.4%
Confidence52.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 57.2% | Colombia payoff 51.8%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 48.4% | Colombia payoff 37.6%

Open full comparison

Ecuador (ECU)

23.7%

Overall Fit Rank24.3%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential35.6%
Confidence47.6%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 58.9% | Ecuador payoff 52.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 48.3% | Ecuador payoff 38.5%

Open full comparison

Cayman Islands (CYM)

23.5%

Overall Fit Rank28.4%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential37.7%
Confidence33.3%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 61.9% | Cayman Islands payoff 53.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 43.5% | Cayman Islands payoff 34.5%

Open full comparison