Economic

GDP Nominal
N/A
GDP per Capita
N/A
Growth Rate
N/A
Inflation Rate
N/A
Unemployment Rate
N/A
Exports
N/A
Imports
N/A
Trade Balance
N/A

Demographic

Population
2,608 people
Population Growth
N/A
Population Density
N/A
Urbanization Rate
N/A
Life Expectancy
N/A
Literacy Rate
N/A
Languages
English, Samoan, Tokelauan

Technology & Infrastructure

Internet Penetration
N/A
Electricity Access
N/A
R&D Expenditure
N/A
Patents Filed
N/A

Environment & Resources

CO2 Emissions per Capita
N/A
Renewable Energy Share
N/A
Forest Cover
N/A
Freshwater Availability
N/A

Top Matched Partner Countries

Strategy: Resource First | Average score 27.2 | Confidence 46.9

Showing 31 of 131 partners (page 3 of 3)

Guyana (GUY)

22.8%

Overall Fit Rank29.0%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential36.3%
Confidence45.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 59.2% | Guyana payoff 53.6%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 44.9% | Guyana payoff 32.1%

Open full comparison

Armenia (ARM)

22.8%

Overall Fit Rank23.0%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential35.9%
Confidence47.6%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 59.3% | Armenia payoff 52.8%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 45.4% | Armenia payoff 37.4%

Open full comparison

Panama (PAN)

22.8%

Overall Fit Rank26.7%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential32.0%
Confidence42.9%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 55.4% | Panama payoff 48.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 45.8% | Panama payoff 38.2%

Open full comparison

Tunisia (TUN)

22.7%

Overall Fit Rank23.7%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential32.9%
Confidence50.0%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 55.5% | Tunisia payoff 50.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 45.7% | Tunisia payoff 38.5%

Open full comparison

Cambodia (KHM)

22.7%

Overall Fit Rank29.8%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential26.8%
Confidence50.0%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 50.0% | Cambodia payoff 43.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 45.0% | Cambodia payoff 39.2%

Open full comparison

Montenegro (MNE)

22.6%

Overall Fit Rank26.4%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential39.3%
Confidence42.9%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 62.9% | Montenegro payoff 55.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 44.9% | Montenegro payoff 36.0%

Open full comparison

Guatemala (GTM)

22.6%

Overall Fit Rank32.8%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential27.4%
Confidence50.0%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 50.6% | Guatemala payoff 44.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 45.7% | Guatemala payoff 37.5%

Open full comparison

Algeria (DZA)

22.5%

Overall Fit Rank24.8%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential35.3%
Confidence47.6%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 57.6% | Algeria payoff 53.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 49.1% | Algeria payoff 38.4%

Open full comparison

Venezuela (VEN)

22.3%

Overall Fit Rank29.4%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential28.4%
Confidence50.0%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 51.2% | Venezuela payoff 45.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 45.1% | Venezuela payoff 35.2%

Open full comparison

Jordan (JOR)

22.2%

Overall Fit Rank22.5%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential39.0%
Confidence50.0%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 62.2% | Jordan payoff 56.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 47.2% | Jordan payoff 37.9%

Open full comparison

Maldives (MDV)

22.0%

Overall Fit Rank23.0%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential37.0%
Confidence45.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 61.3% | Maldives payoff 53.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 43.9% | Maldives payoff 35.5%

Open full comparison

Antigua and Barbuda (ATG)

22.0%

Overall Fit Rank24.6%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential36.3%
Confidence40.5%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 60.2% | Antigua and Barbuda payoff 52.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 42.3% | Antigua and Barbuda payoff 34.5%

Open full comparison

Honduras (HND)

21.9%

Overall Fit Rank28.0%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential27.1%
Confidence45.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 50.5% | Honduras payoff 44.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 44.6% | Honduras payoff 38.5%

Open full comparison

Macau (MAC)

21.7%

Overall Fit Rank23.2%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential40.8%
Confidence35.7%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 64.7% | Macau payoff 57.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 47.2% | Macau payoff 38.3%

Open full comparison

Nepal (NPL)

21.6%

Overall Fit Rank35.8%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential24.8%
Confidence47.6%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 47.4% | Nepal payoff 42.4%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 44.4% | Nepal payoff 36.2%

Open full comparison

Eswatini (SWZ)

21.4%

Overall Fit Rank33.7%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential21.8%
Confidence47.6%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 45.4% | Eswatini payoff 38.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 39.2% | Eswatini payoff 34.1%

Open full comparison

Cuba (CUB)

21.3%

Overall Fit Rank23.3%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential34.4%
Confidence45.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 57.9% | Cuba payoff 51.3%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 47.7% | Cuba payoff 36.4%

Open full comparison

Ghana (GHA)

21.2%

Overall Fit Rank26.2%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential28.8%
Confidence47.6%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 51.5% | Ghana payoff 46.3%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 46.3% | Ghana payoff 38.3%

Open full comparison

Kiribati (KIR)

21.1%

Overall Fit Rank27.0%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential38.4%
Confidence38.1%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 62.2% | Kiribati payoff 54.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 42.4% | Kiribati payoff 33.8%

Open full comparison

Bermuda (BMU)

21.0%

Overall Fit Rank26.0%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential42.1%
Confidence33.3%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 64.1% | Bermuda payoff 60.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 45.5% | Bermuda payoff 34.4%

Open full comparison

Nicaragua (NIC)

20.9%

Overall Fit Rank28.3%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential24.5%
Confidence45.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 48.2% | Nicaragua payoff 41.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 43.0% | Nicaragua payoff 37.7%

Open full comparison

Sri Lanka (LKA)

20.9%

Overall Fit Rank29.7%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential26.3%
Confidence42.9%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 49.2% | Sri Lanka payoff 43.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 45.0% | Sri Lanka payoff 37.0%

Open full comparison

Bahamas (BHS)

20.8%

Overall Fit Rank24.8%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential38.7%
Confidence40.5%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 60.3% | Bahamas payoff 57.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 45.1% | Bahamas payoff 34.6%

Open full comparison

Botswana (BWA)

20.7%

Overall Fit Rank26.8%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential28.1%
Confidence47.6%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 51.2% | Botswana payoff 45.3%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 42.7% | Botswana payoff 34.3%

Open full comparison

El Salvador (SLV)

20.6%

Overall Fit Rank21.8%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential29.8%
Confidence47.6%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 53.4% | El Salvador payoff 46.6%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 44.4% | El Salvador payoff 36.9%

Open full comparison

Cape Verde (CPV)

20.6%

Overall Fit Rank22.2%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential33.7%
Confidence45.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 57.4% | Cape Verde payoff 50.3%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 43.0% | Cape Verde payoff 35.5%

Open full comparison

Belize (BLZ)

20.6%

Overall Fit Rank23.0%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential31.9%
Confidence50.0%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 55.6% | Belize payoff 48.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 41.5% | Belize payoff 34.3%

Open full comparison

Samoa (WSM)

20.4%

Overall Fit Rank26.6%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential29.4%
Confidence40.5%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 53.3% | Samoa payoff 46.0%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 40.8% | Samoa payoff 34.0%

Open full comparison

Bolivia (BOL)

20.4%

Overall Fit Rank20.6%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential31.4%
Confidence50.0%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 54.8% | Bolivia payoff 48.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 45.6% | Bolivia payoff 36.0%

Open full comparison

Lebanon (LBN)

20.3%

Overall Fit Rank20.8%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential33.8%
Confidence45.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 56.9% | Lebanon payoff 51.0%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 43.4% | Lebanon payoff 35.1%

Open full comparison

Jamaica (JAM)

20.2%

Overall Fit Rank23.6%
Trade Pull0.0%
Mutual Win Potential37.2%
Confidence45.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Tokelau payoff 60.2% | Jamaica payoff 54.4%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Tokelau payoff 45.5% | Jamaica payoff 31.7%

Open full comparison