Trinidad and Tobago

TT / TTO

Economic

GDP Nominal
$25,633,544,529.48
GDP per Capita
$18,733.41
Growth Rate
2.51%
Inflation Rate
0.53%
Unemployment Rate
3.33%
Exports
N/A
Imports
N/A
Trade Balance
N/A

Demographic

Population
1,368,333 people
Population Growth
0.06%
Population Density
266.57 /km²
Urbanization Rate
53.96%
Life Expectancy
73.49 years
Literacy Rate
96.94%
Languages
English

Technology & Infrastructure

Internet Penetration
84.7%
Electricity Access
98.7%
R&D Expenditure
0.05% of GDP
Patents Filed
2

Environment & Resources

CO2 Emissions per Capita
19.58 t/person
Renewable Energy Share
0.5%
Forest Cover
44.24%
Freshwater Availability
0.34 km³

Top Matched Partner Countries

Strategy: Balanced | Average score 37.0 | Confidence 82.0

Showing 50 of 248 partners (page 1 of 5)

DR Congo (COD)

51.4%

Overall Fit Rank70.2%
Trade Pull9.4%
Mutual Win Potential42.4%
Confidence90.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 63.4% | DR Congo payoff 61.4%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 57.6% | DR Congo payoff 66.9%

Open full comparison

Central African Republic (CAF)

50.9%

Overall Fit Rank79.7%
Trade Pull7.7%
Mutual Win Potential42.0%
Confidence85.7%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 58.0% | Central African Republic payoff 66.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 62.1% | Central African Republic payoff 54.4%

Open full comparison

Mozambique (MOZ)

50.6%

Overall Fit Rank67.8%
Trade Pull7.0%
Mutual Win Potential40.5%
Confidence95.2%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 57.6% | Mozambique payoff 63.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 60.8% | Mozambique payoff 59.5%

Open full comparison

Niger (NER)

50.6%

Overall Fit Rank72.0%
Trade Pull11.4%
Mutual Win Potential41.5%
Confidence92.9%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 57.9% | Niger payoff 65.4%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 63.1% | Niger payoff 57.6%

Open full comparison

Madagascar (MDG)

50.2%

Overall Fit Rank70.7%
Trade Pull6.1%
Mutual Win Potential41.9%
Confidence88.1%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 58.7% | Madagascar payoff 65.4%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 61.2% | Madagascar payoff 58.5%

Open full comparison

Uganda (UGA)

50.2%

Overall Fit Rank71.5%
Trade Pull7.6%
Mutual Win Potential41.5%
Confidence88.1%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 57.5% | Uganda payoff 65.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 61.7% | Uganda payoff 59.1%

Open full comparison

Somalia (SOM)

49.4%

Overall Fit Rank69.6%
Trade Pull6.2%
Mutual Win Potential41.9%
Confidence85.7%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 57.8% | Somalia payoff 66.4%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 57.8% | Somalia payoff 59.7%

Open full comparison

Tanzania (TZA)

49.4%

Overall Fit Rank65.0%
Trade Pull7.3%
Mutual Win Potential41.5%
Confidence90.5%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 58.4% | Tanzania payoff 64.8%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 61.6% | Tanzania payoff 60.4%

Open full comparison

Burundi (BDI)

49.3%

Overall Fit Rank77.1%
Trade Pull6.9%
Mutual Win Potential41.6%
Confidence83.3%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 58.1% | Burundi payoff 65.4%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 62.7% | Burundi payoff 52.1%

Open full comparison

Chad (TCD)

49.2%

Overall Fit Rank70.1%
Trade Pull9.3%
Mutual Win Potential40.4%
Confidence90.5%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 57.1% | Chad payoff 64.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 64.3% | Chad payoff 56.4%

Open full comparison

Burkina Faso (BFA)

49.1%

Overall Fit Rank68.9%
Trade Pull12.2%
Mutual Win Potential40.0%
Confidence88.1%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 56.8% | Burkina Faso payoff 63.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 62.7% | Burkina Faso payoff 57.3%

Open full comparison

Guinea-Bissau (GNB)

48.5%

Overall Fit Rank69.2%
Trade Pull14.4%
Mutual Win Potential41.9%
Confidence85.7%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 58.3% | Guinea-Bissau payoff 65.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 56.6% | Guinea-Bissau payoff 54.5%

Open full comparison

Ethiopia (ETH)

48.5%

Overall Fit Rank68.4%
Trade Pull7.5%
Mutual Win Potential41.0%
Confidence90.5%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 56.8% | Ethiopia payoff 65.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 61.5% | Ethiopia payoff 59.0%

Open full comparison

Liberia (LBR)

48.3%

Overall Fit Rank72.4%
Trade Pull13.4%
Mutual Win Potential42.1%
Confidence83.3%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 58.2% | Liberia payoff 66.4%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 59.5% | Liberia payoff 53.3%

Open full comparison

Guinea (GIN)

48.1%

Overall Fit Rank60.9%
Trade Pull15.5%
Mutual Win Potential40.2%
Confidence85.7%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 57.6% | Guinea payoff 63.0%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 58.9% | Guinea payoff 60.7%

Open full comparison

Malawi (MWI)

48.0%

Overall Fit Rank66.4%
Trade Pull6.8%
Mutual Win Potential39.3%
Confidence90.5%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 56.7% | Malawi payoff 62.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 61.5% | Malawi payoff 54.8%

Open full comparison

Zambia (ZMB)

47.8%

Overall Fit Rank63.8%
Trade Pull7.5%
Mutual Win Potential39.5%
Confidence90.5%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 56.0% | Zambia payoff 63.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 57.3% | Zambia payoff 58.0%

Open full comparison

Sierra Leone (SLE)

47.7%

Overall Fit Rank67.2%
Trade Pull14.5%
Mutual Win Potential40.5%
Confidence85.7%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 57.4% | Sierra Leone payoff 63.8%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 59.2% | Sierra Leone payoff 55.2%

Open full comparison

Haiti (HTI)

47.6%

Overall Fit Rank60.5%
Trade Pull53.2%
Mutual Win Potential39.5%
Confidence85.7%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 56.2% | Haiti payoff 63.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 55.8% | Haiti payoff 55.1%

Open full comparison

Rwanda (RWA)

47.4%

Overall Fit Rank59.3%
Trade Pull7.4%
Mutual Win Potential41.2%
Confidence90.5%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 57.8% | Rwanda payoff 64.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 56.3% | Rwanda payoff 59.4%

Open full comparison

Republic of the Congo (COG)

47.2%

Overall Fit Rank58.7%
Trade Pull8.9%
Mutual Win Potential37.0%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 55.6% | Republic of the Congo payoff 58.4%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 54.3% | Republic of the Congo payoff 59.3%

Open full comparison

Eritrea (ERI)

47.1%

Overall Fit Rank66.5%
Trade Pull6.4%
Mutual Win Potential40.8%
Confidence83.3%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 57.1% | Eritrea payoff 64.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 56.7% | Eritrea payoff 55.8%

Open full comparison

Togo (TGO)

46.7%

Overall Fit Rank59.6%
Trade Pull11.1%
Mutual Win Potential41.1%
Confidence85.7%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 57.9% | Togo payoff 64.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 56.8% | Togo payoff 58.5%

Open full comparison

Papua New Guinea (PNG)

46.7%

Overall Fit Rank60.6%
Trade Pull4.4%
Mutual Win Potential38.8%
Confidence92.9%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 56.7% | Papua New Guinea payoff 61.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 62.0% | Papua New Guinea payoff 54.8%

Open full comparison

Zimbabwe (ZWE)

46.2%

Overall Fit Rank60.7%
Trade Pull7.4%
Mutual Win Potential38.5%
Confidence90.5%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 55.1% | Zimbabwe payoff 62.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 55.5% | Zimbabwe payoff 57.3%

Open full comparison

Nigeria (NGA)

46.1%

Overall Fit Rank58.6%
Trade Pull11.5%
Mutual Win Potential39.9%
Confidence92.9%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 57.1% | Nigeria payoff 63.0%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 59.2% | Nigeria payoff 58.9%

Open full comparison

Mali (MLI)

45.8%

Overall Fit Rank58.1%
Trade Pull13.7%
Mutual Win Potential40.2%
Confidence85.7%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 56.8% | Mali payoff 63.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 58.6% | Mali payoff 59.4%

Open full comparison

Cameroon (CMR)

45.5%

Overall Fit Rank56.9%
Trade Pull10.0%
Mutual Win Potential39.6%
Confidence92.9%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 56.0% | Cameroon payoff 63.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 55.3% | Cameroon payoff 58.6%

Open full comparison

Gabon (GAB)

44.5%

Overall Fit Rank52.1%
Trade Pull9.9%
Mutual Win Potential35.1%
Confidence90.5%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 51.6% | Gabon payoff 59.0%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 47.9% | Gabon payoff 60.4%

Open full comparison

Kenya (KEN)

44.2%

Overall Fit Rank50.4%
Trade Pull7.4%
Mutual Win Potential39.7%
Confidence85.7%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 56.6% | Kenya payoff 63.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 57.9% | Kenya payoff 61.4%

Open full comparison

Benin (BEN)

44.0%

Overall Fit Rank51.1%
Trade Pull11.2%
Mutual Win Potential39.1%
Confidence85.7%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 56.5% | Benin payoff 61.8%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 58.5% | Benin payoff 58.9%

Open full comparison

American Samoa (ASM)

43.9%

Overall Fit Rank46.6%
Trade Pull5.3%
Mutual Win Potential43.1%
Confidence73.8%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 71.0% | American Samoa payoff 56.4%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 59.7% | American Samoa payoff 58.7%

Open full comparison

Angola (AGO)

43.9%

Overall Fit Rank49.5%
Trade Pull9.7%
Mutual Win Potential37.9%
Confidence90.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 57.3% | Angola payoff 58.5%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 56.0% | Angola payoff 59.4%

Open full comparison

South Sudan (SSD)

43.7%

Overall Fit Rank54.6%
Trade Pull7.3%
Mutual Win Potential38.1%
Confidence85.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 62.5% | South Sudan payoff 54.1%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 56.5% | South Sudan payoff 59.6%

Open full comparison

Ivory Coast (CIV)

43.7%

Overall Fit Rank47.5%
Trade Pull13.3%
Mutual Win Potential38.4%
Confidence92.9%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 56.2% | Ivory Coast payoff 60.8%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 55.9% | Ivory Coast payoff 59.9%

Open full comparison

Guatemala (GTM)

43.4%

Overall Fit Rank41.8%
Trade Pull27.4%
Mutual Win Potential37.0%
Confidence92.9%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 54.3% | Guatemala payoff 59.8%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 52.1% | Guatemala payoff 61.6%

Open full comparison

Nicaragua (NIC)

43.0%

Overall Fit Rank37.2%
Trade Pull29.9%
Mutual Win Potential37.2%
Confidence88.1%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 54.9% | Nicaragua payoff 59.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 51.3% | Nicaragua payoff 61.9%

Open full comparison

Eswatini (SWZ)

42.8%

Overall Fit Rank45.8%
Trade Pull6.6%
Mutual Win Potential37.4%
Confidence90.5%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 54.9% | Eswatini payoff 60.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 47.9% | Eswatini payoff 58.3%

Open full comparison

Nepal (NPL)

42.7%

Overall Fit Rank47.5%
Trade Pull5.3%
Mutual Win Potential39.3%
Confidence90.5%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 56.1% | Nepal payoff 62.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 52.0% | Nepal payoff 60.3%

Open full comparison

Solomon Islands (SLB)

42.4%

Overall Fit Rank42.4%
Trade Pull4.2%
Mutual Win Potential39.5%
Confidence85.7%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 57.5% | Solomon Islands payoff 61.6%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 50.9% | Solomon Islands payoff 58.9%

Open full comparison

Myanmar (MMR)

42.2%

Overall Fit Rank46.2%
Trade Pull4.9%
Mutual Win Potential39.1%
Confidence90.5%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 56.5% | Myanmar payoff 61.8%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 54.7% | Myanmar payoff 58.7%

Open full comparison

Sudan (SDN)

42.2%

Overall Fit Rank52.6%
Trade Pull7.8%
Mutual Win Potential37.8%
Confidence90.5%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 55.4% | Sudan payoff 60.3%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 55.7% | Sudan payoff 55.0%

Open full comparison

Honduras (HND)

42.1%

Overall Fit Rank33.8%
Trade Pull29.1%
Mutual Win Potential36.6%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 51.4% | Honduras payoff 62.7%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 54.6% | Honduras payoff 58.2%

Open full comparison

Sweden (SWE)

42.0%

Overall Fit Rank41.8%
Trade Pull10.6%
Mutual Win Potential38.6%
Confidence85.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 52.4% | Sweden payoff 66.1%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 44.3% | Sweden payoff 58.5%

Open full comparison

Paraguay (PRY)

42.0%

Overall Fit Rank37.5%
Trade Pull20.8%
Mutual Win Potential37.1%
Confidence88.1%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 54.9% | Paraguay payoff 59.5%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 49.1% | Paraguay payoff 63.8%

Open full comparison

Brazil (BRA)

42.0%

Overall Fit Rank34.6%
Trade Pull29.5%
Mutual Win Potential37.7%
Confidence95.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 52.3% | Brazil payoff 63.9%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 48.2% | Brazil payoff 64.5%

Open full comparison

Cambodia (KHM)

41.7%

Overall Fit Rank37.2%
Trade Pull4.4%
Mutual Win Potential36.9%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 51.4% | Cambodia payoff 63.4%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 54.3% | Cambodia payoff 58.8%

Open full comparison

Bhutan (BTN)

41.5%

Overall Fit Rank46.9%
Trade Pull4.6%
Mutual Win Potential34.5%
Confidence88.1%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 51.0% | Bhutan payoff 58.5%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 46.5% | Bhutan payoff 59.9%

Open full comparison

Uruguay (URY)

41.5%

Overall Fit Rank38.5%
Trade Pull16.7%
Mutual Win Potential37.7%
Confidence90.5%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 51.4% | Uruguay payoff 65.3%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 48.6% | Uruguay payoff 60.3%

Open full comparison

Venezuela (VEN)

41.3%

Overall Fit Rank26.7%
Trade Pull81.2%
Mutual Win Potential34.6%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 50.4% | Venezuela payoff 59.4%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

Trinidad and Tobago payoff 47.1% | Venezuela payoff 60.3%

Open full comparison