Economic

GDP Nominal
$28,750,956,130,731.2
GDP per Capita
$84,534.04
Growth Rate
2.79%
Inflation Rate
2.95%
Unemployment Rate
4.2%
Exports
$3,193,500,000,000
Imports
$4,103,100,000,000
Trade Balance
$-909,600,000,000

Demographic

Population
340,110,988 people
Population Growth
0.98%
Population Density
36.82 /km²
Urbanization Rate
80.12%
Life Expectancy
78.39 years
Literacy Rate
N/A
Languages
English

Technology & Infrastructure

Internet Penetration
93.14%
Electricity Access
100%
R&D Expenditure
3.59% of GDP
Patents Filed
262,244

Environment & Resources

CO2 Emissions per Capita
13.62 t/person
Renewable Energy Share
10.9%
Forest Cover
33.87%
Freshwater Availability
444.29 km³

Top Matched Partner Countries

Strategy: Technology First | Average score 39.9 | Confidence 84.2

Showing 50 of 249 partners (page 1 of 5)

DR Congo (COD)

58.5%

Overall Fit Rank79.5%
Trade Pull9.8%
Mutual Win Potential51.4%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 72.2% | DR Congo payoff 70.5%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 47.8% | DR Congo payoff 56.5%

Open full comparison

Central African Republic (CAF)

57.9%

Overall Fit Rank88.1%
Trade Pull8.7%
Mutual Win Potential47.0%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 70.8% | Central African Republic payoff 63.5%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

United States payoff 57.3% | Central African Republic payoff 55.2%

Open full comparison

Niger (NER)

57.0%

Overall Fit Rank78.2%
Trade Pull12.4%
Mutual Win Potential49.2%
Confidence95.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 71.9% | Niger payoff 66.7%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

United States payoff 52.9% | Niger payoff 51.0%

Open full comparison

Chad (TCD)

55.7%

Overall Fit Rank75.9%
Trade Pull10.6%
Mutual Win Potential49.2%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 73.1% | Chad payoff 65.5%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

United States payoff 56.9% | Chad payoff 55.7%

Open full comparison

Uganda (UGA)

55.5%

Overall Fit Rank75.8%
Trade Pull8.7%
Mutual Win Potential49.3%
Confidence90.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 70.5% | Uganda payoff 68.2%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 46.9% | Uganda payoff 55.5%

Open full comparison

Mozambique (MOZ)

55.1%

Overall Fit Rank70.6%
Trade Pull7.2%
Mutual Win Potential49.1%
Confidence97.6%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 69.5% | Mozambique payoff 68.7%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 45.2% | Mozambique payoff 53.3%

Open full comparison

Burkina Faso (BFA)

54.9%

Overall Fit Rank73.5%
Trade Pull12.8%
Mutual Win Potential48.9%
Confidence90.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 71.5% | Burkina Faso payoff 66.4%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

United States payoff 53.2% | Burkina Faso payoff 51.6%

Open full comparison

Burundi (BDI)

54.8%

Overall Fit Rank81.5%
Trade Pull7.7%
Mutual Win Potential46.1%
Confidence85.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 71.5% | Burundi payoff 61.3%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

United States payoff 59.1% | Burundi payoff 56.1%

Open full comparison

Madagascar (MDG)

54.3%

Overall Fit Rank72.1%
Trade Pull6.7%
Mutual Win Potential48.8%
Confidence90.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 70.0% | Madagascar payoff 67.6%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 46.3% | Madagascar payoff 55.1%

Open full comparison

Ethiopia (ETH)

54.2%

Overall Fit Rank73.3%
Trade Pull9.2%
Mutual Win Potential49.2%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 70.3% | Ethiopia payoff 68.1%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 47.3% | Ethiopia payoff 55.3%

Open full comparison

Somalia (SOM)

53.7%

Overall Fit Rank71.8%
Trade Pull7.5%
Mutual Win Potential47.6%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 66.5% | Somalia payoff 68.8%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 46.8% | Somalia payoff 56.1%

Open full comparison

Tanzania (TZA)

53.3%

Overall Fit Rank66.0%
Trade Pull8.2%
Mutual Win Potential50.0%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 70.4% | Tanzania payoff 69.6%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 46.3% | Tanzania payoff 54.4%

Open full comparison

Malawi (MWI)

53.2%

Overall Fit Rank69.0%
Trade Pull7.4%
Mutual Win Potential47.0%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 70.3% | Malawi payoff 63.9%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

United States payoff 54.8% | Malawi payoff 51.7%

Open full comparison

Liberia (LBR)

53.1%

Overall Fit Rank76.7%
Trade Pull12.7%
Mutual Win Potential45.3%
Confidence85.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 68.3% | Liberia payoff 62.4%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 46.8% | Liberia payoff 56.1%

Open full comparison

Guinea-Bissau (GNB)

52.4%

Overall Fit Rank70.9%
Trade Pull13.7%
Mutual Win Potential44.5%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 65.4% | Guinea-Bissau payoff 63.6%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 46.8% | Guinea-Bissau payoff 55.6%

Open full comparison

Zambia (ZMB)

52.2%

Overall Fit Rank66.5%
Trade Pull7.9%
Mutual Win Potential46.6%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 66.1% | Zambia payoff 67.2%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 44.6% | Zambia payoff 52.9%

Open full comparison

Sierra Leone (SLE)

52.1%

Overall Fit Rank69.2%
Trade Pull13.6%
Mutual Win Potential46.1%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 68.0% | Sierra Leone payoff 64.4%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 46.6% | Sierra Leone payoff 53.4%

Open full comparison

Eritrea (ERI)

52.0%

Overall Fit Rank69.2%
Trade Pull8.0%
Mutual Win Potential45.2%
Confidence85.7%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 65.4% | Eritrea payoff 64.9%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 47.3% | Eritrea payoff 54.5%

Open full comparison

Papua New Guinea (PNG)

51.6%

Overall Fit Rank62.2%
Trade Pull6.7%
Mutual Win Potential47.2%
Confidence95.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 70.7% | Papua New Guinea payoff 64.0%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

United States payoff 54.3% | Papua New Guinea payoff 50.2%

Open full comparison

Rwanda (RWA)

51.6%

Overall Fit Rank61.9%
Trade Pull8.3%
Mutual Win Potential46.8%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 65.1% | Rwanda payoff 68.6%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 46.9% | Rwanda payoff 54.5%

Open full comparison

Guinea (GIN)

51.6%

Overall Fit Rank60.8%
Trade Pull14.6%
Mutual Win Potential48.7%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 67.7% | Guinea payoff 69.8%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 45.9% | Guinea payoff 52.6%

Open full comparison

Haiti (HTI)

51.4%

Overall Fit Rank62.8%
Trade Pull45.5%
Mutual Win Potential44.4%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 64.6% | Haiti payoff 64.2%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 45.7% | Haiti payoff 52.9%

Open full comparison

Mali (MLI)

50.7%

Overall Fit Rank61.2%
Trade Pull14.1%
Mutual Win Potential47.9%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 67.3% | Mali payoff 68.5%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 47.7% | Mali payoff 53.5%

Open full comparison

American Samoa (ASM)

50.6%

Overall Fit Rank53.8%
Trade Pull7.5%
Mutual Win Potential47.1%
Confidence76.2%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

United States payoff 69.6% | American Samoa payoff 64.8%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 70.5% | American Samoa payoff 62.4%

Open full comparison

Togo (TGO)

50.4%

Overall Fit Rank60.4%
Trade Pull11.4%
Mutual Win Potential46.6%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 65.6% | Togo payoff 67.6%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 46.9% | Togo payoff 54.1%

Open full comparison

Republic of the Congo (COG)

50.4%

Overall Fit Rank59.1%
Trade Pull9.3%
Mutual Win Potential45.9%
Confidence95.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 64.4% | Republic of the Congo payoff 67.5%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 40.8% | Republic of the Congo payoff 48.9%

Open full comparison

Zimbabwe (ZWE)

49.9%

Overall Fit Rank62.0%
Trade Pull7.8%
Mutual Win Potential45.3%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 64.3% | Zimbabwe payoff 66.4%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 43.5% | Zimbabwe payoff 51.8%

Open full comparison

Cameroon (CMR)

49.5%

Overall Fit Rank58.2%
Trade Pull10.7%
Mutual Win Potential45.8%
Confidence95.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 64.0% | Cameroon payoff 67.7%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 46.3% | Cameroon payoff 53.3%

Open full comparison

South Sudan (SSD)

49.4%

Overall Fit Rank56.6%
Trade Pull8.5%
Mutual Win Potential47.1%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 71.3% | South Sudan payoff 63.3%

Technology Transfer and Joint R&D

Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.

United States payoff 57.3% | South Sudan payoff 56.0%

Open full comparison

Nigeria (NGA)

49.3%

Overall Fit Rank60.2%
Trade Pull12.4%
Mutual Win Potential48.0%
Confidence95.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 68.0% | Nigeria payoff 68.1%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 43.7% | Nigeria payoff 52.6%

Open full comparison

Kenya (KEN)

49.0%

Overall Fit Rank53.7%
Trade Pull8.6%
Mutual Win Potential48.6%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 66.7% | Kenya payoff 70.6%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 47.1% | Kenya payoff 52.8%

Open full comparison

Benin (BEN)

48.5%

Overall Fit Rank52.5%
Trade Pull11.6%
Mutual Win Potential47.7%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 67.3% | Benin payoff 68.0%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 47.1% | Benin payoff 51.5%

Open full comparison

Ivory Coast (CIV)

46.9%

Overall Fit Rank47.5%
Trade Pull13.1%
Mutual Win Potential46.8%
Confidence95.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 64.6% | Ivory Coast payoff 69.1%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 44.6% | Ivory Coast payoff 50.4%

Open full comparison

Guatemala (GTM)

46.8%

Overall Fit Rank40.5%
Trade Pull37.4%
Mutual Win Potential45.5%
Confidence95.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 60.8% | Guatemala payoff 70.8%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 43.7% | Guatemala payoff 49.4%

Open full comparison

Angola (AGO)

46.7%

Overall Fit Rank48.5%
Trade Pull9.9%
Mutual Win Potential46.8%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 66.0% | Angola payoff 67.7%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 43.0% | Angola payoff 49.0%

Open full comparison

Gabon (GAB)

46.5%

Overall Fit Rank50.9%
Trade Pull10.3%
Mutual Win Potential42.7%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 56.7% | Gabon payoff 69.6%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

United States payoff 39.4% | Gabon payoff 53.6%

Open full comparison

Nicaragua (NIC)

46.4%

Overall Fit Rank36.2%
Trade Pull33.7%
Mutual Win Potential45.2%
Confidence90.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 60.0% | Nicaragua payoff 71.0%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

United States payoff 41.2% | Nicaragua payoff 53.7%

Open full comparison

Mauritania (MRT)

46.2%

Overall Fit Rank37.4%
Trade Pull16.0%
Mutual Win Potential46.8%
Confidence90.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 65.4% | Mauritania payoff 68.3%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 45.6% | Mauritania payoff 45.8%

Open full comparison

Sudan (SDN)

46.1%

Overall Fit Rank54.2%
Trade Pull9.7%
Mutual Win Potential44.3%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 64.5% | Sudan payoff 64.1%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 43.8% | Sudan payoff 49.9%

Open full comparison

Nepal (NPL)

45.8%

Overall Fit Rank47.5%
Trade Pull8.1%
Mutual Win Potential44.9%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 60.8% | Nepal payoff 69.5%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 45.4% | Nepal payoff 52.4%

Open full comparison

Solomon Islands (SLB)

45.2%

Overall Fit Rank40.8%
Trade Pull6.3%
Mutual Win Potential43.6%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 59.6% | Solomon Islands payoff 68.0%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 46.4% | Solomon Islands payoff 51.2%

Open full comparison

Myanmar (MMR)

45.1%

Overall Fit Rank45.0%
Trade Pull7.7%
Mutual Win Potential45.6%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 63.5% | Myanmar payoff 67.8%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 45.2% | Myanmar payoff 51.4%

Open full comparison

Honduras (HND)

45.0%

Overall Fit Rank31.5%
Trade Pull37.9%
Mutual Win Potential45.6%
Confidence90.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 60.1% | Honduras payoff 71.8%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

United States payoff 40.5% | Honduras payoff 53.9%

Open full comparison

Eswatini (SWZ)

45.0%

Overall Fit Rank43.9%
Trade Pull6.8%
Mutual Win Potential41.7%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 56.7% | Eswatini payoff 67.4%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 43.1% | Eswatini payoff 49.7%

Open full comparison

Lesotho (LSO)

44.9%

Overall Fit Rank37.9%
Trade Pull6.6%
Mutual Win Potential44.2%
Confidence90.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 61.6% | Lesotho payoff 67.0%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 46.2% | Lesotho payoff 49.0%

Open full comparison

Gambia (GMB)

44.4%

Overall Fit Rank42.4%
Trade Pull14.3%
Mutual Win Potential43.3%
Confidence88.1%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 61.5% | Gambia payoff 65.2%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 47.2% | Gambia payoff 51.4%

Open full comparison

Cambodia (KHM)

44.4%

Overall Fit Rank35.2%
Trade Pull6.8%
Mutual Win Potential45.9%
Confidence95.2%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 60.2% | Cambodia payoff 72.5%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 43.6% | Cambodia payoff 48.4%

Open full comparison

Pakistan (PAK)

44.1%

Overall Fit Rank36.1%
Trade Pull9.3%
Mutual Win Potential48.6%
Confidence97.6%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 66.0% | Pakistan payoff 71.4%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 43.8% | Pakistan payoff 47.9%

Open full comparison

Yemen (YEM)

43.7%

Overall Fit Rank34.0%
Trade Pull8.5%
Mutual Win Potential47.2%
Confidence92.9%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 65.4% | Yemen payoff 69.1%

Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact

Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.

United States payoff 46.9% | Yemen payoff 46.0%

Open full comparison

Namibia (NAM)

43.7%

Overall Fit Rank32.1%
Trade Pull8.0%
Mutual Win Potential44.8%
Confidence90.5%

Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration

Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.

United States payoff 61.5% | Namibia payoff 68.4%

Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership

Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.

United States payoff 43.3% | Namibia payoff 53.0%

Open full comparison