Trade Corridor and Supply-Chain Integration
64.0%
Large combined demand and logistics compatibility improve bilateral trade surplus potential.
Iran
56.0%
Sweden
72.0%
Shared gain
43.3%
Iran vs Sweden
Overall Mutual Score: 51.3%
Overall Fit Rank51.3%
Trade Pull29.2%
Mutual Win Potential43.3%
Risk Drag18.6%
Iran profile
Market Size86.7%
Resource Strength17.0%
Tech Readiness89.8%
Human Capital86.6%
Infrastructure76.0%
Energy Position0.9%
Climate Pressure54.3%
Governance27.1%
Sweden profile
Market Size82.0%
Resource Strength14.5%
Tech Readiness97.8%
Human Capital64.5%
Infrastructure100.0%
Energy Position57.9%
Climate Pressure21.4%
Governance86.3%
What These Countries Should Do Together
Top joint action plans ranked by expected shared benefit.
Skills Mobility and Human Capital Partnership
49.4%
Labor-market complementarity and digital readiness increase long-run productivity in both economies.
Iran
41.7%
Sweden
57.0%
Shared gain
28.4%
Food-Water-Climate Resilience Pact
20.1%
Climate asymmetry and natural-capital differences hedge systemic shocks for both countries.
Iran
17.5%
Sweden
22.8%
Shared gain
0.0%
Technology Transfer and Joint R&D
16.6%
Capability gaps plus adequate skills make co-development and diffusion efficient.
Iran
18.1%
Sweden
15.1%
Shared gain
0.0%
Critical Resource and Energy Exchange
6.5%
Asymmetric resource endowments and energy profiles support mutually beneficial contracts.
Iran
10.6%
Sweden
2.4%
Shared gain
0.0%